@DosFox clone aficionado! I found a cool thing you might like.
Have a look at page 78 here: https://win.adrirobot.it/nuova_elettronica/pdf/nuova-elettronica-104-105.pdf

I went to buy food for my cats and came home with a paper copy of this old magazine, and there is a kit of an (allegedly) Apple IIe compatible clone described. Complete with schematics, pity the thing uses PROMs/PALs and of course those are not described in the article.

Would be so cool to find one and clone the clone...

To everyone that followed the discussion about the DELTA:
The person that sent me ROMs/PLDs dumps has confirmed they're the full set, but has yet to respond on the permission to release them. If I hear nothing for a few days, I will simply release them under my responsibility and credit him. He's not selling repros, that I know of.

@DosFox here has checked the ROMs and confirmed the main ones are mostly identical to unenhanced IIe ROMs: where the big difference lies is in the video ROM. Not unexpected given the presence of a 6545 CRTC onboard.
I guess that ROM will have to be studied. This curbs hopes of an easy "enhanced" mod tho

I still think this clone is totally worth a resurrection attempt. As such, I'll begin the process of rebuilding the schematic in KiCAD.

Hmm I re-read the component list. The DELTA uses a 6545 CRTC, not a 6845.

They are not totally interchangeable: http://www.6502.org/users/andre/hwinfo/crtc/diffs.html

I suspect this will be an headache, maybe minor, but one still, as not all 6545 seem equal either.

Also, I think I'll have to order a few, as I can't seem to have any in storage...

Differences of CRTC models

Differences of CRTC models 6545 and 6845

That's it. All the ICs for the DELTA (minus the video card) spread out.

Now I just need to wire them up.

Easy Peasy.

I've decided to start with the memory, so I begun placing the symbols and their connections.

Now, I don't know how you like to do that, but i mostly work with paper.
I take notes on paper, sometimes i sketch part of schematics on paper, and in these cases, I definitely work better by printing out the schematics and highlighting the parts I've already taken care of.

Enough for today. More than half of the first sheet (on a total of 3) of the schematic was converted to KiCAD.
More than 3/4 of the first sheet are in a KiCAD schematic now

I think the first sheet is done.
It needs cleanup, reordering. Maybe some net labeling.

But it's done. And so I am for today.

Sheet 2 of 3 done. This one was simpler, contained just the bus connectors, some address decoding and the power connector.
The person that sent me the dumps for the Delta said that he's preparing a specific section for it and the files at his website www.z80ne.com, currently dedicated to another computer by Nuova Elettronica
@hkz oh that is good to hear!
Time to start on sheet 3 of 3.
Didn't have much time today, but little progress is progress still.
Around 1/3 of the 3rd and last sheet is done.
Another small progress on the last sheet.
Very short on time this weekend: now I need to go out and help the wife at the stand we have at a local fair.
Another small update on the DELTA. Slightly over 2/3 of the last sheet I'd say.

The DELTA schematics (minus the two video boards) have now been transposed into KiCAD format. Ended up being a bit of a rat's nest in some parts, but this'll be a concern for future me.

I'll now wait one or two days then have a look at them with a fresh eye, and see if I spot glaring errors on my part.

I'm left with just an unused gate, and the electrical rules inspector not complaining (too much), which is encouraging.

Once this is done, I will release everything for others to peruse. I hope I'll be getting the photos of the original PCBs by then, as those will help greatly in recreating the board and spot additional errors.

Back to the DELTA.
Begun the first of the two video boards. This one has both a crude RF encoder and monochrome composite out.
Ok. Monochrome video board done.
Tomorrow the RGB one, then I guess the main unit is done.
After that time for a quick check, release and then start designing the PCB.
@hkz I'm honestly so excited to see how this turns out!
@DosFox I suspect it'll turn out to be very painful.
@hkz I immediately recognized the style of Nuova Elettronica schematics, well before looking at the other toots of this thread :-) BTW, I recall quite well the DELTA project. It was an interesting computer!

@davbucci yup! It looks like a very interesting machine. Roberto from https://www.z80ne.com/ provided the dumps for the ROMs and the PLDs. He said there's a chance he'll come up with photos of the PCB, which would be great both in a duplication effort and in a troubleshooting process.

Crossing fingers that we can get this thing resurrected!

The home of Z80 N.E. - Il computer Z80 di Nuova Elettronica

@hkz Roberto is a true hero. He is hosting the website for the Olivetti M20, too: https://www.z80ne.com/m20/index.php He did this for free for more than a decade, now.
Olivetti M20

@davbucci yep, I saw your name in there. And I might need all those info sooner or later. I have two M20 s in storage, both with their screens cut away, but I wonder if there's still life in them.
@hkz very cool! The M20 is a very interesting machine. If you want, I can publish pictures of your machines here: https://www.z80ne.com/m20/index.php?argument=sections/photos/photos.inc BTW, let me know if you need information about how to repair/service them. I do not recall everything by heart, but if I can help it will be with pleasure.
Olivetti M20

@davbucci oh thanks! I will get back to you about this, you can count on that. And when I do, I'll also send you photos. Right now they're still behind a pile of other boxes after my last move...

@hkz woah that's definitely piqued my interest!

I'll dig into that when I have the chance

@DosFox I doubt I'll ever run into one in the wild. The cost for that thing in kit form was considerable.

Still, sometimes Nuova Elettronica kits pop up at fairs, so I'll keep an eye out just in case.

@hkz those schematics are absolutely gorgeous though.

Shame that the ROMs/PROMs are likely lost to time

@hkz it reminds me that the Franklin Ace 2000s were iie compatible machines that were made entirely out of TTL parts and a few PALs.

The schematics are online, not sure about the ROMs and PALs

@DosFox Wouldn't surprise me if this is actually a clone of the Franklins.
@hkz that would also be unsurprising 😅

@DosFox From an italian newsgroup, one guy mentioned he checked the ROMs and found them to be almost identical to original IIe ones. The PROMs/PALs on the other hand, he did say he was able to copy 5 of 7, but the last 2 were registered.

And all this was 17 years ago. You know what, I'll ask him anyway.

@hkz may as well!

Reminds me I need to message that guy with a prototype Macintosh ii

@DosFox @hkz "prototype Macintosh II" 👀 👀 👀

Definitely want to hear more about this if you hear from him.

@csilverman @hkz sadly it's not very interesting - it's basically a Rev A Macintosh ii logic board. The most interesting part is that the HMMU is actually a small daughter board made out of three PALs
@DosFox @hkz ah, I see. I'd read somewhere that the Mac II initially had an odd design where the computer's power supply was in the monitor, not the computer itself. Apparently they stuck with that setup for a while during development, so I was wondering if this one might have been from that period.

@csilverman well that's... Intriguing. Isn't that part of the original medium Mac proposal?

Admittedly information on the Macintosh ii (well, Milwaukee) is pretty sparse. It doesn't help that people get confused with Big Mac as well 😅

@DosFox Yeah, I thought Medium Mac *was* the Mac II: http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/apple/mac/prototypes/1985_Med_Mac/Med_Mac_Proposal_19850607.pdf

Here it is! Page 230, “Insanely Great”, by Steven Levy:

"Until very late in the process, [Mac II hardware designer Brian] Berkeley dictated that the power supply would be placed in the monitor—a surprisingly wrongheaded solution that would have limited the range of screen options available to Mac II users."

(That "Power Supply In Monitors vs. In CPU" item in the proposal does suggest this was a point of contention.)

@csilverman the Macintosh ii originally was the Milwaukee prototype, which in turn was span out of the big Mac project (its original name was the "Little Big Mac) - I'm not sure if the medium Mac is referring to a separate variation of the Big Mac or the Milwaukee 😅

@DosFox From the book:

"Dhuey believed that out of the File Server's ashes should come Macintosh II, or as he called it, Little Big Mac"

"Jean-Louis Gassee came across the project and benignly permitted it to continue, albeit as sort of a "background skunkworks"...[Gassee] renamed the project "Milwaukee."

As I understand it:

- LBM/MM were what this was called when it started
- Got named Milwaukee further along
- This didn't come from BM—that was something else: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Mac_(computer)

Big Mac (computer) - Wikipedia

@DosFox "Insanely Great" has a good overview of the story:

- The File Server, which never happened
- BigMac—also never happened, sounds like it was supposed to be a superpowered successor to the all-in-one Mac, vs the pizza-box form factor of the File Server/Mac II
- and then Dhuey's secret spinout of the File Server, which he called Little Big Mac/Medium Mac
- …after which Jean-Louis renamed it Milwaukee/Reno/Uzi/Paris… (these guys *loved* their codenames)
- and then *that* shipped as Mac II

@DosFox Wat.

The guy answered already. Sent me the JEDs and the ROM dumps.

But he actually sent me 7 JEDs, not 5. I'm asking him if he was able to reverse the remaining ones during these 17 years.

Because, if he did, I have a IIe clone to build here.

@hkz I'm sorry WHAT.
@hkz I mean obvious check is to check the .JEDs and see what the device is