What is needed is not merely local aid networks and the like. What is needed is a political organization that is rooted in the working class and acts as a coherent entity inside an entire country, network of countries, or even the entire world.*
* I will acknowledge that the CNT FAI and other such organizations overcome this. This is more a criticism of individualist anarchism and the like
And the anarchists who support propaganda of the deed fail to understand that history is not made by great men. It is made by mass movements, social classes, and the dialectic of history.
Killing one bourgeois or one Nazi will not end capitalism or fascism. It never has and it never will. Capitalism and fascism are not even weakened by the deaths of one or two people, except on a very brief and temporary basis.
Our oppression is maintained by a vast machine that is oiled and geared by an army of people. It will therefore take an army to destroy it in whole. Removing one gear is almost never enough. When you convince yourself that it is enough, you are driving yourself down a path that is a waste of time that frankly might get you killed.
What we need is a strategy that reaffirms the role of the masses of working people in the abolition of capitalism. A strategy that is based in mass democracy, and not lone wolf terror, is the way forward.
No Luigi will save us. We collectively are our own Spartacus. We should act like it.
"
I am interested in the sort of resistance we pursue, not because we necessarily believe it will produce desired changes or lead us into a brighter future, but because it is the most meaningful response to this world we can imagine. Because we simply canβt stomach the idea of being passive in the face of a system this brutal, regardless of how far we may be from our dreams. Nihilism urges anarchists to embrace our feelings of cynicism around radical milieus, our feelings of boredom with prescribed methods of resistance, our feelings of hopelessness in the current landscape of domination, and to engage in forms of revolt that cultivate immediate joy and moments of liberation.
" - Blessed Is The Flame
@burnoutqueen This is just hierarchical realism, the bolsheviks did the same thing "without us you wont ACHIEVE anything" well if the choices are red fascism or classic fascism I'd rather just do what we can with actual anarchist organising. Revolution isnt a single moment that either succeeds or fails it is a coming together of new social relations that render the old system obsolete, by the time we can say "the revolution has happened" (if indeed it ever happens) it will have been a forgone conclusion for a long time, if we attempt to fight the state on their terms, with their party politics we will lose, the only option is to change the rules. "there is no need to hope or despair only to look for new weapons"
just to elaborate a bit, doing party politics at all is to agree with an axiom of democratic socialism the idea that we can vote away the state, to *whatever* extent such a party gains the power necessary to do so it will just morph into the seat of power and become the new state, there will *always* be some new excuse as to why they need to hold onto the power longer to prevent counterrevoultion
I do believe in collective organising I'm not an individualist anarchist but I dont believe in using the state in any way shape or form to achieve our goals
