Here are some pieces and journalists I actually learnt something from: @justinling on Kirk’s position in the MAGA movement including this line:
“In the same way that his beliefs do not justify his murder, his murder can’t justify his beliefs either.”
https://www.bugeyedandshameless.com/p/who-was-charlie-kirk-anyway
And this one via Ryan Broderick sent me down some rabbit holes (but in a good way).
https://www.garbageday.email/p/charlie-kirk-was-killed-by-a-meme
None of this is to say that we know the motivation of the shooter or really much else - as all these pieces point out.
The most important thing to remember in these sorts of breaking news situations is to accept and acknowledge the uncertainty.
As I kept repeating re the science during the pandemic: WE DON’T KNOW (YET) and you should not trust anyone pretending they do.
But that doesn’t mean that there isn’t interesting and important context to be given on what we do know. You can hate the rush but social media will fill a vacuum quickly, and badly.
So read these pieces and if you feel you learnt from them share them and that can be your good deed for a better information ecosystem for the day… ;)