JacquelineAccessibility is broken on Wayland because accessibility is an afterthought in Linux spaces and very few people are willing to make the internal backend changes needed to fix Orca.
Pointing out this fact is not far right propaganda for xlibre.
you can use the x11 desktop stack for a valid technical reason, while avoiding one specific fork made by a far right asshole that is being polluted with LLM generated code.
I personally use x11 for a different reason: my preferred desktop is MATE, and the wayland port is not yet in the debian repository.
When forky comes out, I might switch.
Additionally, GSDE needs x11 because it utilizes a specific hack in order to create a GNUStep wrapper around chromium.
Additionally, many non-Linux unixlikes use x11 to function, most notably the BSDs.
Their kernels do not have wayland support. Wayland is designed for the linux kernel, not the NetBSD kernel.
Their kernels do not have wayland support. Wayland is designed for the linux kernel, not the NetBSD kernel.
"X11 is a step on the alt-right pipeline" is such a dangerous piece of misinformation that it must be combated.
x11 has been a hegemonic technology since the 19 fucking 80s.
its hegemony has not been entirely broken as of yet, and wayland isn't up to speed with x11 on everything.
x11 will likely always have a niche somewhere in the world, long after it has been superseded.
Steve Holden@burnoutqueen X11 was an industry conspiracy to ensure Sun’s NeWS did not become the dominant display technology, otherwise we’d have had on-screen PostScript for almost forty years.