GrapheneOSAug 27, 2025

We've received the Pixel 10 we ordered and have confirmed it supports unlocking, flashing another verified boot key and locking again.

Our Pixel 10 support will likely only be possible to complete after we finish porting to Android 16 QPR1 which is being released in September.

Show threadGrapheneOSAug 27, 2025

A second Pixel 10 we ordered has arrived at a package forwarding service in the US to be shipped to a country without Pixels available.

We'll order a Pixel 10 Pro (XL) and Pixel 10 Pro Fold for our main device testing farm today too since we'll supporting all 4 variants of them.

Show threadGrapheneOSAug 27, 2025
Previously, we likely would have been able to implement support for the Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL in the next 48 hours. However, we likely need to wait for Android 16 QPR1 and our port to it since we don't expect a Pixel 10 device branch will be pushed to AOSP.
Show threadGrapheneOSAug 27, 2025
We've received confirmation that Android is switching to having quarterly releases across devices. There will be 3 quarterly and 1 yearly release of Android and the Android Open Source Project. Monthly releases are Pixel exclusive and will have far fewer changes than before.
Show threadGrapheneOSAug 27, 2025
Previously, only Pixels shipped the quarterly releases in practice. Other OEMs will now be pushed to ship those, but not the monthly releases which are now officially Pixel exclusive. Please note monthly Android Security Bulletins are a different thing from the monthly releases.
Show threadGrapheneOSAug 27, 2025
Android Security Bulletins are backports of a subset of patches deemed High/Critical severity to older Android releases. That currently means the initial yearly releases of Android 13, 14, 15 and 16 without the monthly/quarterly updates for those. This will need to change now.
Show threadGrapheneOSAug 27, 2025
The changes are acceptable for us and we can deal with it. We're currently working with a major OEM towards future generations of their devices meeting our requirements and providing official GrapheneOS support. GrapheneOS on both Pixels and these future non-Pixels will be fine.
Show threadGrapheneOSAug 27, 2025
Pixels are still the most secure Android devices and the only ones combining a high level of security with proper support for an alternate OS. However, it's clear they don't value alternate OS support and won't remain the best devices for GrapheneOS once we have official ones.
Show threadGrapheneOSAug 27, 2025
We could continue supporting future Pixels such as the Pixel 11 and Pixel 12 after we have another option available but we won't depend on them continuing to provide alternate OS support. It's good that the Pixel 10 still provides it since our alternative is a year or two away.
Show threadxyhhx 🔻Aug 27, 2025
@GrapheneOS wait, you're working on official devices?? 👀
Show threadGrapheneOSAug 28, 2025
@xyhhx We're working on GrapheneOS support for future generations of a subset of the device models provided by a major Android OEM. Their current devices don't provide the updates and security features we need, but they're capable of doing it. We're working with them towards providing this so we can support their devices. They may end up officially selling devices with GrapheneOS as an option but that's not the bare minimum and it can be successful even without initially having that.
Show threadMichaelAug 31, 2025

@GrapheneOS I'm really hoping for a situation where Graphene works with Fairphone to make a viable 1st party Graphene phone.

That would meet both the privacy and repairability / longevity needs I feel many are looking for.

I understand Fairphone currently is very far from meeting the requirements, but one can hope that expressing this at least gets them on the radar.

Show threadGrapheneOSAug 31, 2025
@mikeymop Fairphone's devices have atrocious security and are very far from meeting our hardware requirements. They very clearly do not prioritize security and also have negligible engineering resources with nearly everything done by their ODM. You should read https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private. They're definitely not a reasonable choice for GrapheneOS support. The marketing claims for their devices for long term support and updates aren't at all accurate. They already have an incompatible partnership too.
Devices lacking standard privacy/security patches and protections aren't private - GrapheneOS Discussion Forum

GrapheneOS discussion forum

GrapheneOS Discussion Forum
Show threadGrapheneOSAug 31, 2025
@mikeymop Murena are blatant scammers pushing an extraordinarily insecure/non-private OS and services as something they're not. They're heavily invested into spreading misinformation about GrapheneOS and attacking our project/team. We won't work with a company that's partnered with Murena, who are in fact enemies of privacy and security to the point they secretly send user data to OpenAI and act as if that's a private service better than Apple doing it locally. Their products are truly scams.
Show threadDanielSep 1, 2025
@GrapheneOS @mikeymop so a Nothing phone with gos is definitely excluded for the same reason
It let us mainly Chinese brand or Volla for the future of GOS after the Pixel
Show threadGrapheneOSSep 1, 2025
@DanielDNK @mikeymop Nothing devices don't currently meet our requirements but we would be willing to work with them.
Show threadDaniel
@GrapheneOS @mikeymop FYI they did partnership with Murena to be able to sell brand new CMF phone with /e/OS on it but buy it cheaper than the retail price and keep the Nothing warranty. They are a special reseller with a specific partnership like Fairphone is to let them access to brand new phones for less than the MSRP...
Sep 1, 2025 at 3:34pmWeb
Show threadGrapheneOSSep 1, 2025
@DanielDNK @mikeymop Selling them devices at a bulk rate isn't really a partnership. That's nothing like Fairphone spreading misinformation for them and participating in their attacks on GrapheneOS.
Show threadDanielSep 1, 2025
@GrapheneOS @mikeymop
What ?
You mean Murena ?
I never heard about Fairphone talking about GrapheneOS in this terms
Show threadGrapheneOSSep 1, 2025
@DanielDNK @mikeymop Fairphone has explicitly supported them in doing it. We made a post debunking misinformation from Murena and Fairphone responded to it with a corporate speak response lacking substance. Murena responded with a bunch of misdirection and misinformation. Fairphone helped mislead people into believing that through their response supporting Murena. Fairphone did that after the CEO of Murena had personally targeted our founder and encouraged harassment, which our post addressed.
Show threadBenSep 11, 2025
@GrapheneOS I heard about this and read some of the posts, but didn't realize it had escalated so much or that Fairphone had gotten involved! 😳 Would you mind sharing links or other resources so I can do more research on this? I'd really like to be as informed as possible because I've been rooting for Fairphone, but now I'm skeptical. I'd also like to see more of the stuff from Murena because I only heard about the initial post from them.
Show threadBenSep 11, 2025
@GrapheneOS I'm especially curious about the ChatGPT thing you mentioned and any other specifics about how Murena is privacy washing and what not.
Show threadBenSep 11, 2025

Currently reading this one you sent

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private

Devices lacking standard privacy/security patches and protections aren't private - GrapheneOS Discussion Forum

GrapheneOS discussion forum

GrapheneOS Discussion Forum
Show threadGrapheneOSSep 11, 2025

@perksofbeingben Not ChatGPT but rather OpenAI's speech-to-text service instead of doing it locally. In fact, OpenAI themselves has perfectly good models for running locally on the device.

See https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private where we provided a link about this and other things.

Devices lacking standard privacy/security patches and protections aren't private - GrapheneOS Discussion Forum

GrapheneOS discussion forum

GrapheneOS Discussion Forum
Show threadGrapheneOSSep 11, 2025
@perksofbeingben See https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private.
Devices lacking standard privacy/security patches and protections aren't private - GrapheneOS Discussion Forum

GrapheneOS discussion forum

GrapheneOS Discussion Forum