I can agree that car culture is making some games worse because of terrible infrastructure thinking, Cyberpunk is a terrible choice to criticize. It’s supposed to be a capitalistic hellscape, why wouldn’t the same terrible city design influence Night City’s corporate builders?

Because dystopian setting doesn’t have to mean shitty gameplay and design.

Are you seriously saying that Cyberpunk of all games have bad gameplay?

I’m not certain what argument you’re making here. That Cyberpunk by definition cannot have bad gameplay, or that Cyberpunk has been critically acclaimed to have good gameplay.

I am simply stating that I, along with most other people, who have played the game would say that Cyberpunk’s gameplay is amazing. I would say that you eight haven’t played the game or isn’t a serious person if you state that Cyberpunk’s gameplay is bad, as if that is an obvious statement.

First of all, I am not the author. I haven’t even played CP. I am merely sharing someone else’s opinions. Furthermore I will point out that CP was absolutely lambasted on release to the point that it became a joke, so it’s far from obvious to others that its “gameplay is amazing”.

In fact, the video makes the argument that most the flaws of CP are down to the lost effort of trying to make a large car-central cityscape with their budget, so I’m seriously wondering if you actually watched the video or you’re one of those weird nerds who reflexively feels the need to jump in front of criticism for megacorporations who don’t give a fuck about you. Which would be extra ironic when the subject is CP.

Please don’t abbreviate cyberpunk.