I wrote a post on my blog where I propose a simple solution to fix the Internet. I'd love your feedback. https://gardinerbryant.com/fixing-the-internet-part-1-the-cost-of-data/
Fixing the Internet—Part 1: The Cost of Data

I'm not going to say this is an original idea, but I did arrive at this idea on my own.

The Bryant Blog
@gardiner_bryant On first approximation, this seems like a good idea.

But I do think that 'fix the internet' is perhaps a bit optimistic as an outcome - the underlying issue is still the fundamental way in which corporations (and capitalism) operate; by taking from the commons for personal gain, in either power *or* money. Right now, that's with data, but there's no reason it can't be done with other things.

So yeah, I do think this could make a significant difference on the topic of data collection. But I also think that this will simply cause corporations to shift to other forms of extraction and exploitation that (either by a technicality or actually) don't run afoul of this tax. And ruin the internet, and realistically all of society, in a different way.
@gardiner_bryant Loois like it's missing some images in the "computers that look like this" bit.
@gardiner_bryant I love this idea, but it pains me that most users of Facebook, X, etc. would throw an absolute fit if these companies switched to charging a monetary fee (for services those users previously regarded as "free") because platforms could no longer profit from data collection. So many users don't care enough that they are being constantly monitored to support moves like this.... It makes me sick 😫
@FlannelGoat the idea is to make the unethical business practices of surveillance capitalism completely unaffordable. Facebook would have to pay $8k+ a month per user to keep the status quo
@gardiner_bryant Understood and 100% onboard with this approach myself. I was just referring to potential challenges garnering public support if these companies' potential moves to ethical practices included directly charging their user base to make up for no longer profiting from their data.
@FlannelGoat I guess the point I was trying to make is that these companies wouldn't be able to "pass the cost on to their users" because nobody would be able to afford covering these costs. 🤷
@gardiner_bryant the issue i see is that like almost any app you'll find in the play store for example needs you to agree to be tracked for some reason even sinple apps like a clock (Googles clock app needs play services or microG to work and has network permissions).
we should stop this nonsense cuz if like every app dev has your data that means it's easier to find the one that has poor security with that or the ones that profit from tracking and profiling you.
@gardiner_bryant i feel like we need stuff like microG cuz it acts like play services and makes apps work but it remoces a lot of identifiers or randomizes them and alsohas no functionalities for a app that calls privacy harmful features like firebase-analytics. it is designed to not cause apps to crash and have the least amount of data being send to google and apps that request tracking stuff.
but it's sad to have to resort to stuff like this cuz if not you'll get screwed....
@Idcrafter my solution would make them tracking you financially out of reach.
@gardiner_bryant yeah it would be sweet to do so but untill that happens are those solution for the time it takes.
in the company i work for am i in a high position in the programmer team and do plan a lot of stuff that we do and i always hear how we should implement google analytics or similar tracking stuff even tho we have our own privacy respecting analytics tools specially designed by us for us.
i think that they teach people to do whatever with userdata for some reason...