WEHRABOOS OUT
WEHRABOOS OUT
Tigers, Leopards, Mice.
What? I’m at the zoo, actually.
Panthers, Elephants, Rats
They have every thing here!
You know what the worst kind of thing is? Being into historical tanks and planes while still believing that war is pretty shitty and the Nazis didn’t lose hard enough.
Yes, I think a tank is a cool engineering achievement. No, I don’t want to talk to you about how war crimes are actually neat. No, I don’t want to help you beat up minorities.
Exactly. WW2 is the last great period of analog engineering.
It’s also the only time racists had a technological edge going into a fight so they cling to the idea they had a chance. The overlap is frustrating. I just want to learn more about analog circuits that can be shot out of a cannon!
It’s more like Germany had a test run in Spain where they got to try out all of their new toys and strategies in a live environment. While everyone else was still planning for a new round of trench warfare.
I think it’s funny that everyone thinks that Germany had the most advanced tech they didn’t. They did have the most advanced presses and they did have more refined metallurgical processes. But that’s because they didn’t have any good local sources of iron. Just a lot of magnesium and coal.
Tldr being really good in a few Fields out of 30 odd Fields required for warfare does not make you the most technologically advanced.
Same. I do enjoy WW2 tanks, and yes, that includes German ones. And yes, I think the Tiger H1 is pretty neat.
But so was PzIV F.
And so was the Sherman.
Fw190 was an excellent plane.
So was the Hawker Hurricane.
And the F4U.
I’m in it for the tech, not the fascist stuff. It’s just that it’s easier to find info on the German hardware, as long as one is able to separate facts from propaganda.
“It took 5 Shermans to take out a tiger”… …Yes. Took 5 shermans to take out anything else too. Because that was the usual operational unit.
t34 was junk, tho.
“It took 5 Shermans to take out a tiger”… …Yes. Took 5 shermans to take out anything else too. Because that was the usual operational unit.
This also demonstrates the huge manufacturing deficeit on the part of the axis
Yeah, one aspect of the German military after the fall of France is how depleted they were both in manpower and hardware. Sure, they were still a powerful army, but nowhere near their full operational strength as defined in doctrine.
If Germany were able to magically reinforce up to full strength, the outcome could have been very different (on land at least. Navy was severely lacking in most respects). Their manufacturing were only barely able to compete with UK and her allies at the beginning of the war, let alone USSR and the US once they entered the war.
And manpower surges during the war came at the cost of industry. On a surface level it might seem like Germany was great at reducing unemployment and all that, but the truth is that it was an act of desperation - the war economy was bleeding Germany of any and all capable adult (and many who weren’t even adult), and this is obviously not something that can be sustained in the long run. And especially concerning for russia these days is what happens when you try to turn a war economy into a civilian economy - It’s going to be a disaster. War economy uncurs a massive debt, financially and otherwise, and one day that debt needs to be paid.
When talking about WW2 planes, I immediately remember the cardboard SHARPEST THOUSAND FOLD STEEL Zero
It’s easy to filter out the heeraboos by probing which B-word they use to describe German land doctrine.
Bewegungskrieg (I may have spelled that incorrectly) was the actual dictrine, and yes, it was an innovative precursor to today’s land-air battle. Blitzkrieg was just a slang.
I have a neighbor who claims to be a historian. specialized in civil war history. specifically the south.
unsurprisingly they voted for an orange bastard.