paint is poison. I don’t see people making anti-print posts. Not to diss on your antiAI zealotry ( i am your asshole, you see; i love antiAI.) I just would like to see more antiPrint posts, if the environment is your concern.
When it comes to intellectual property… are you mouthing the corporations that profit from it? Is intellectual property the solution to keep creative people alive in an exploitive economy?
it’s not “whataboutism”. An image maker, has to take it into consideration.
marginally few artists use natural materials. If pollution is the corcern, then there will be no movies, no touring groups, no streaming, no paintings, no prints, no this… no that.
:) thanks for “triggering me”.
i ask for coherence. If you take it as whataboutism 🤷
Harmfulness of paint doesn’t discredit environmental questions around certain uses of AI.
Textbook whataboutism.
AI is harmful to the environment, to which you responded, NO paint is harmful.
Now you are tripling down. Cut the crap.
to which you responded, NO paint is harmful.
i didn’t wrote that. I wrote something like this ☞ “AI is harmful to the environment”, yes, as well as some other image generation media. I don’t see, like tge example i chose in that post, anti-paint posts.
is whataboutism always irrelevant? Always? AAALLLWWWAAAYYYSSS?
ThefuzzyFurryComrade
rnercle
apfelwoiSchoppen
wizblizz