maybe this could be avoided if academic papers came with some sort of short summary. if this were provided by the authors, then we wouldn't need to rely on expensive and unreliable tools to generate them. think how convenient it would be if the authors put these summaries right near the start of the paper!!

https://www.sigarch.org/the-role-of-llms-in-academic-reviewing/

The role of LLMs in academic reviewing

Editor’s note: With continuing proliferation of LLMs and their capabilities, academic community started to discuss their potential role in paper reviewing process. Some conferences are alread…

SIGARCH
@regehr how s that different from abstract section?
@xameer @regehr Yes, It's called an abstract.
They just didn't bracket it:
/s..../s.
FWIW when 'summarising' a paper LLMs often seem to ignore the abstract.
@marjolica @regehr then isn't that a flaw ( read dark pattern) of the llm?