maybe this could be avoided if academic papers came with some sort of short summary. if this were provided by the authors, then we wouldn't need to rely on expensive and unreliable tools to generate them. think how convenient it would be if the authors put these summaries right near the start of the paper!!

https://www.sigarch.org/the-role-of-llms-in-academic-reviewing/

The role of LLMs in academic reviewing

Editor’s note: With continuing proliferation of LLMs and their capabilities, academic community started to discuss their potential role in paper reviewing process. Some conferences are alread…

SIGARCH
@regehr i'm worried about the upcoming “rather extreme concrete proposal” that is promised by the editor. (And by the way, how can one be *rather* extreme?)