If we had to torture and murder millions of innocent children to stop global warming would that be okay?
If we had to torture and murder millions of innocent children to stop global warming would that be okay?
You can construct a trolley problem to justify anything you want. It’s about the constraints that the person who posed the question chose. You don’t really get to choose in a trolley problem. The constraints choose for you. In the real world, our options are not so constrained and the outcomes are not so clear. As such it is useless for actually figuring out what to do.
The trolley problem is a useful basic philosophical experiment to get people to think about things and reflect on constraints, assumptions, and values. And often the best response is in fact “fuck these constraints and assumptions!”
*people can construct, not you specifically. But maybe you, I don’t know.
Are you going to read or think about the comment or are we done here?