The more I roll it around in my mouth, the more certain I am that the "AI" mania *perfectly* encapsulates neoliberalism in its entirety.

- doesn't work and never has
- steals everything around it
- produces nothing of value
- destroys all things with actual value
- lies
- creates the illusion of efficiency while vastly increasing both monetary and social costs
- is supported by militant zealots with tiny minds and hearts
- enriches a tiny group of individuals at the cost of destroying Earth

On top of that:

- viciously punishes people who refuse to pretend they're eager to participate
- creates incredible suffering wherever it goes
- cannot exist without exploiting the global South
- is subsidized by governments at the expense of social programs
- makes up most of the "data" it presents to the public

@johnzajac Which explains why middle-management and the spiritual-middle-managers of centrist governments like the UK can't see what's wrong with it: what's wrong with it is what's wrong with them.

@petealexharris @johnzajac My bleary morning-eyes misread that as "muddle-management". I think I'll adopt it.

But spot-on for the observation

@johnzajac see also:

https://danmcquillan.org/decomputing_as_resistance.html

"I'm proposing that AI is itself a glitch; a stuttering misstep of the neoliberal order that hints at nothing less than internal disarray."

Decomputing as Resistance

@[email protected] @[email protected] To add to the above: ChatGPT is the perfect neoliberal actor. No matter what text is presented, it treats responding as a rationalized selection from a menu of 50,000 possible next tokens (based on Stephen Wolfram's account). Language is no longer a richly creative, collaborative, and open-ended human activity, but instead a fully boxed-in sequence of choices from a pre-constrained list. It's as interesting as a game of tic-tac-toe played on a 250 x 250 board, yet here we are.
@johnzajac None of this is AI. All of this is Techbro Capitalism.

@AeonCypher It's both.
But you gave me a good laugh with your avatar.

@johnzajac

@DerGiga @johnzajac Explain to me how running "AI" on my laptop enriches anyone or destroys the earth?

Edit: LMAO, you stole your profile image.

@AeonCypher I'm sorry I gave you the impression, I would waste any more of my attention on you. @johnzajac

@DerGiga @johnzajac Naturally.

It's incredibly easy to complain about things you don't understand.

It's much much harder to put in the work understand the thing and resist it.

@johnzajac I see where you’re going but I think this fits better with colonialism, of which neoliberalism is just a scooby doo villain mask for.
@johnzajac not only encapsulates: literally embodies (insofar as a cloud server installation is a “body”).

@johnzajac My blog’s name/purpose comes from the fact that everything AI doomers fear about the tech is more true of market capitalism. It’s a runaway optimization process whose criteria for “solving” problems often excludes human lives (externalities).

We’ve created a system where we reward people who know more than others, even if that includes knowing how to deceive the public.

https://misaligned.markets/capitalism-ai-alignment/

#ai #capitalism #economics #philosophy

What do AI alignment fears reveal about market capitalism?

There are high-level similarities between the types of incentive problems that exist in the economy and optimization problems AI programmers face.

Misaligned Markets

@johnzajac As I'm not that smart, I had to look it up:

"Neoliberalism is a political and economic ideology that emphasizes free-market capitalism and limited government intervention. It generally advocates for deregulation, privatization, and reduced social spending, with the belief that free markets are the most efficient way to allocate resources and promote individual liberty."

@johnzajac a while ago, I settled on the notion that rapacious capitalism was our version of the barbarian incursions in the old fall-of-the-empire narratives -- and from that perspective, the AI mania feels like we've reached the stage of leering conquistadors rushing the temples, slaughtering priests, prying every shiny bauble off the walls, while their captain recites banal platitudes about how they're advancing civilization
@johnzajac all of those things were said about the Internet in the past.
How does the Internet score today?
Would the world be better or worse without the Internet?
@johnzajac well said.
I have to add a small caveat: AI is very, very promising in cancer diagnosis via visual pattern recognition.
There are a couple of good uses. Shoving it down our throats as the new messiah is still grade A bullshit.
@johnzajac well said. We must fight AI with every means possible.

@johnzajac AI is ecocide ;
Neoliberalism is ecocide

https://wiki.techinc.nl/User:Becha/AI_is_ecocide

User:Becha/AI is ecocide - Technologia Incognita

@johnzajac
- doesn't work and never has
Depends on what you mean by "doesn't work." Those of us who are blind aare, for the first time, able to paarticipate the same as our sighted peers so far as pictures are concerned.
Oh sure there mightt be a few hallucinations, decreasing with more and more blind users) but it's a helluva lot better than asking a million and one questions of our sighted friends.
- steals everything around it
I can't speak for this as the services we use allow us to opt in to whether or not our data is used to train the models.
- produces nothing of value
See above. We value our independence. AI is now part of that. Especially where the smartt glasses are concerned, and scene descriptions, etc.
- destroys all things with actual value
Is this your opinion, or an objective reality?
- lies
This is why, at least with our resources, there is an option to have it verified by a human, and the programs being tested are being supervised by humans.
- creates the illusion of efficiency while vastly increasing both monetary and social costs
Having the sky described to VIP's and butterflies...I'll take the chance of hallucinations for that efficiency, thanks.
- is supported by militant zealots with tiny minds and hearts
Not true. If this were true, then I guess the blindness orgs using this emerging technology (And ourselves as users( now have a tiny mind and heart. Which could not be further from the truth.
- enriches a tiny group of individuals at the cost of destroying Earth
1.5 million folks isn't small. I'll give you that the energy cost is vast and ruinous at the moment. But perhaps if folks like us users (And you who are criticizing it) would get together, we might be able to lessen it. Maybe not significantly at first, but over time, perhaps.

PS: you can choose to hate and/or block uss, but this is our breakdown for what it's worthh.

Thankfully the other inddividual on my masto followers list makes an exception for use cases like those of the blindness and low vision communities.