Office Productivity
Office Productivity
Hey what part do you think looks like AI slop?
I can’t see anything suspect but I’m looking pretty hard for it. If I’m wrong then that’s scary.
Is the photo somehow glitched that I don’t see?
i also didnt see it at first.
look at the person in the brown coat on the right. their glasses and eyes melted together. the text above them is garbled nonsense. and the person sitting to their left is wearing shoes that dont fit into their background and slightly overlap with the other ones’ shoes. the person on the left holding their glasses seems to still be wearing glasses, and their ear is an unusual shape.
thats about all i noticed tho. pretty scary indeed.
I think you’re wrong.
The glasses are absolutely smudged, but that is from the image processing on the phone. Low light most smartphones try to reduce noise by smoothing the picture, often excessively.
The text above the woman is not garbled nonsense it says “<indecipherable> is biGGer”. The upper case G’s makes it look strange, but it is cohesive text.
The shoes look to be another smoothing artifact.
Yeah. This is potato camera image.
The shoes have New Balance and Nike logos. AI would mess that up. The guy standing with his bag between his legs. AI wouldn’t add that detail. Plus the guy behind him has blurry hand, I’m guessing because it was moving. AI image wouldn’t have that.
look at the person in the brown coat on the right. their glasses and eyes melted together.
No, that is because frames frequently have a lighter color/clear on the inside of the frame so they aren’t as distracting. Tufts of hair near ears can also make things look wonky when you can’t see fhe individual hairs. Blurry hands tends to be moving. This is a low quality image and the ‘blending’ effects are just normal potato image quality.
AI would not be able to get buy holding glasses while face in hands right,l (the black line above his ear is hair), would have screwed up the shoe logos, and a bunch of other small details.
is that important to the discussion?
It’s even better than a real photo in this case, because you don’t have to worry that any depicted person is real and doesn’t want their face plastered over the internet.
I can’t wait until the novelty of GenAI wears off so we can resume concentrating on the message instead of the carrier medium. Either that, or until it becomes undetectable, which will probably be in 1-2 years at the current speed.
What “discussion” lol
“Does this look like (specific policy) is good?” [AI generated frowny faces]
Just wow man. The only thing trash like this accomplishes is making the movement look like it has nothing, hence the need to try and pass off slop. Enjoy your moralizing corporation worship though I’m sure next year’s perfect AI will do really great things for the world
The RTO discussion the text is about, if you didn’t read the text.
What “moralizing corpo worship” do you see in my comment?
You have issues, mate, but i’m pretty sure i cannot help you, better talk to a therapist or smth idc
So much debate about the pixels, when you could just reverse image search and find it’s from a video.
Now talk about the pixels in the tiktok original instead I guess.