edinbruhEverything is so tiny
leo85811nardo“Modern” UI design be like: fat paddings everywhere
MOAR WHITESPACE
Don’t forget:
- Massive fucking fonts
- No visual separation between UI elements
- Hijacked scrolling
- Everything shoved into animated menus
- One (1) context action in the bottom right
PhoeniqzAlso, no right-click menus! You have to click on a three-dot icon at the side of that UI component
Proper GTK4 adwaita apps don’t do that. They scale really well on mobiles to desktops.
Even Gtk3 doesn’t have that issue when properly coded.
Counterargument:
Admittedly this is a chat app, so there’s little to do. But still, it could stretch out a little bit more, maybe open the conversation info panel on the right
What is your monitor’s size?
2560x1080 which is 21:9 full hd. Most programs don’t really handle 21:9 displays, but many GTK apps are particularly bad at it
Wonder why not set a maximum width and have the de respect it eg you maximize and the window grows to max height but not max width
(after edit)
I have no issue with the text size, I have an issue with enormous empty space around the text. It’s fine if it’s not perfect on a 21:9 display, but this wouldn’t look good even on a 16:9 display.
I’m also fine with the text not taking up the entire width, I aggre that it’s less readable. But I think the window (not the text, the window) could utilise the width better.
I say that the messages could be a little more spread out (i.e. my massages could be a little to the right while other’s a little to the left) and just like the left sidepanel appears and disappears when the window is too thin, more sidebars could appear to the right when the window is very wide.
These are all design choices though, not technical limitations of the gdk
AFAIK one of these are technical limitations, it’s just design choices. But in my experience, the design choices made following the gnome design guidelines tend to make apps with tiny faces
That looks like it’s just wrapping a WebView, is it not?
It looks like the CSS is just capping the container class width at 1440px, which has nothing to do with GTK
idegenszavakIt’s Fractal, a matrix client, not a webview: gitlab.gnome.org/World/fractal
Fair - point still stands though - the application only has a single breakpoint defined at 600sp from a cursory glance, the lack of an ultra-wide specific layout is just because it hasn’t been implemented rather than a shortfall of GTK (though I’m not sure you would even want to make the message view wider, as it would impair readability)
Do you want the text to span unlimited pixels?
No, I want it to utilize the space a little bit more, this wouldn’t look good even on a 16:9 display. Which is a shame because when windowed it looks really good.
Hm yeah. Most configurable GNOME application.
swelter_sparkThat would be ideal, IMO.
Sounds like a skills issue/design decision. Like the devs could do otherwise, they just didn’t. There’s nothing in GTK preventing this from working properly.
DonutsRMehAnd that’s an issue. People also use non-GTK4 apps.
u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)Do you have an example?
“Awesome UI”
Damn, did you enlarge Charlie’s face for the meme? 😆
LuciFriends don’t let friends use GNOME
KDE4LYFE
Gnome does have a lot of strong points, I personally use both
Time for a scrolling window manager
Mwagithub.com/paperwm/PaperWM
We have this
We have this
cally [he/they]
Skullgridthe edits to charlie kirk’s face are so subtle these days, I can’t tell if this is the original or has been slightly modified.
It had been so long since I’d seen his real face that I didn’t know how it actually looked like anymore. I saw a clip of him a few days ago and thought ‘oh, they aren’t changing it that much’
there was this real or fake game online that shows Kirk’s face and you try to tell whether it’s edited. it was really funny because it was actually hard to tell.
lmuelI enjoy using Gnome and don’t really encounter any issues in my day to day use
(pls don’t kil me :))
True
Same for me!
I don’t like Gnome, but I am glad it works for you. At the end of the day Gnome is better than Windows, Mac, and CDE.
CDE? First time hearing of this. Off to google. :)
Bilb!Cool Desktop Environment 😎
It was an effort by multiple Unix vendors to create a common desktop environment: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Desktop_Environment
I don’t like using GNOME desktop or apps, but that’s not because its bad or less capable for my usage. I just don’t prefer their design philosophies. Linux desktop users are spoiled by how many great choices we have.
I used to be a GNOME fanatic a couple of years ago. I switched to KDE after I got tired of the perpetually broken state of extensions.
I’m still thankful for all the effort and commitment the GNOME devs have invested over the years though! It’s an excellent desktop environment!
coleI went the opposite way. Wanted to like KDE, but found it too buggy and a bit inconsistent.
On Gnome I use really minimal extensions and those get updated very quickly so it is no longer an issue for me. I also do Gnome Extension reviews so take from that what you will
I think what drove me to that decision was the cpufreq extension. It kept breaking with every update. I usually shrugged it off but it really irked me every time.
My last straw was when they changed the theming system to force the use of libadwaita and broke my customised theme and dark mode. I don’t do a lot of customisation in general but I have rigid preferences when it comes to how I want my system to look and behave. They broke it and that drove me to explore other solutions.
I tested KDE Plasma for a couple days and I managed to replicate my setup in like 4 hours—most of which I spent exploring new things that would be impossible to do in GNOME without modifying its code base—and the end result was an improved setup which was less clunky since I didn’t have to use as many extensions as I did with GNOME to begin with. It was bliss for me.
I ultimately decided to move on.
Huh, this sort of issue is what made me leave KDE in the first place. Haven’t had such problems on gnome.
don’t you just fucking love
paddings!
(apologies to everyone whose device can’t render HTML entities)
festnti was going to ask what it was supposed to look like, then i opened a reply text and all i see is
Unfortunately, beyond the standard Markdown elements, there is zero feature parity between various front-ends and their Markdown renderers.
thx for the screenshot. mine does appear correctly! (i’m on jerboa)
Thunder also renders this correctly!
maybe this works on more devices?
paddings!!!
JackbyDevThat’s not padding that’s pre!
I’m having this problem on Android rn. Coming from iOS, the content density is just super low, and no amount of tweaking display/font size will fix it 🙁
My screen is 50% padding now 🤷🏻♀️
Never got the Mac trend of not using your full screen. I get even less why Gnome copied it.
I’m not sure I understand… GTK can use full screens…
GrilledCheeseSo can OSX for some time now it gives a full screen program it’s own workspace type screen
muusemuuseI actually really like how macOS handled full screen apps, with the windows 8 style side by side and a simple gesture flipping between them like pages in a book.
Gnome pretty much works the same way as well