Shriram Krishnamurthi1/ Feels a bit poignant to be putting finishing touches on the next vesion of my book (PLAI 3.2.5) knowing it'll be the last of the v3, and if my planned experiment goes well, it may be the last longform book I will ever write. I will truly miss longform writing: ↵
2/ There's something wonderful about developing an idea out over 300 pages. And there will always be those who appreciate it. But it is foolish to pretend I'm not competing with everything from TikTok to LLMs. ↵
3/ Heck, even the "long" in "longform" has come to mean just "takes ~10 minutes". Of course, I'm actually writing for myself—to clarify my thoughts—and can still do that. But all the production work, getting it into the world, is ultimately for others. ↵
4/ I will still be "selfish" in that the voice I've found is basically "How do I wish someone had explained this to me". (And I'm touched when people complement that.) And I refuse to kowtow to the marketplace (eg, the book won't be rewritten in Python). ↵
5/ But I'm very much an "evolve or die" kind of person, and happy to view this as a *challenge*, to figure out new and better pedagogies. And anyway, even without all that, the book needs a total rewrite, because I have finally fiugred out what v3 is trying to say. (-:
Prabhakar Ragde@shriramk So does "last longform" mean "I will produce nothing that takes more than ~10 mins"? And if not, what does it mean?
@plragde Well, it won't be packaged as a 300-page book, at least. I don't think I can bring each learning task down to 10 minutes. But I am very much thinking about time quanta, like we have with the SMoL Tutor.
Andres MorenoThe undergraduate with whom I was reading PLAI had a hard time reading the book.
Nothing to do with the style: he has been trained to "Stack Overflow" everything, where one skims to find the information needed to answer a specific question.
In the section on closures, he was hunting for what he needed for the interpreter and used the first version of the code without environments. The few tests that he wrote passed and he was therefore content.
Totally missed the point of the exposition. Did not question why there would be several versions.
He was doing this on his own time during summer vacation, so it isn't hat he is lazy or a slacker.
Reading is hard for this generation. We'll maybe reading is hard and has gotten harder?
@monkey1 @shriramk I've had students (some, not all) "read on demand" for some time now, but usually in the context of a course with assignments. Yes, they run into trouble with progressive exposition. Worse is when a student says "I'm a visual learner," or asks "Are there other resources to learn these ideas?", meaning "Where can I find more examples that I can try to tweak?".
I still write, but it feels increasingly obsolete. Even with my latest work, people are asking for videos.