I’m never one to victim-blame after a breach. Security is hard, social engineering always works eventually, and risk management is genuinely complex. Unless an org was WILDLY negligent, I’m a big believer in not shaming them for getting breached.

That said, the moment a breached org describes the breach as being the result of a “sophisticated” attack, every neck hair I have stands on end and I prepare to retract the benefit of the doubt. Because 99% of the time*, that “sophistication” was a kid claiming to be the county password inspector in an email or some shit.

The lies and hyperbole work for now; but some org is going to get stuck holding the bag on that “but it was sophisticated and impossible to defend against!” tactic when some savvy shareholder (or SEC wonk with an ax to grind) recognizes it as a material falsehood.