Cactuar JoeHappy horse on Mars day!
Tor Lillqvist@CactuarJoe Fun, but it would be lovely to know the source for this. I love to laugh at AI hallucinations as much as any other AI sceptic; still, I fear that it is too easy to just come up with something outrageous and create a meme that makes it seem that an AI claimed it, for kicks or for clicks.
Mx Verda@tml @CactuarJoe (a source for the... sourceless plagiarism machine?)
@MxVerda @CactuarJoe No, but some source that would indicate what plagiarism machine created this, as a response to what prompt, and when.
You do realise that people who are just trying to be fun, or eager to get clicks, easily can create a fake screenshot like that, don't you?
Pete Alex Harris🦡🕸️🌲/∞🪐∫
Barry Schwartz 🫖@petealexharris @tml @MxVerda @CactuarJoe Yes, it doesn't matter.
It is wrong to call this stuff "artificial intelligence", as well, because the people working on it obviously are under the grip of fallacies. Human intelligence must resemble chimpanzee intelligence, and so cannot possibly resemble anything based on language!
These jokers have confused their internal conscious dialog with their intelligence. And they think they can upload their "selves" into a computer, but it is impossible.
@petealexharris @tml @MxVerda @CactuarJoe So it really doesn't matter how we make fun of them.
They aren't hallucinations, because these are not intelligences. They are random pattern generators. They are useful if you know what they actually are.
ChatGPT once quoted my answer to a puzzle but gave my opponents' argument as the defense of it! It was mere random output from its databases.