ππΝΜΊππ@jik Except my first two emails were anything but rude. Why don't you post them so everyone can see how polite and professional I was, and how rude your second response was and how delusional you are? I don't see anything in this message associated with my employer, which is easy for anyone to look up due to my unique name and try and threaten to use against me.
Jonathan Kamens 86 47@scar I am happy to share our entire email exchange, including the last email which you sent me after the message below, which unlike your marginally polite public posting, was once again overtly abusive, thus demonstrating for the second time (the first being when you switched from your work to your personal email) that you KNOW you're being an asshole to me privately and are therefore behaving differently when there is an audience.
@scar Here's the first email in which you acknowledge you've read the release notes in which I explicitly say Betterbird is not supported and yet you're asking me for help with Betterbird anyway.
@scar Here's my reply, in which I reminded you, politely, that I do not support Betterbird.
"Thank you for the offer of help with an Exchange account, but I actually do currently have access to one and I'm in the process of debugging and fixing the Exchange issues, so I don't currently need another account.
Regarding the issue you are seeing, I am sorry, but I do not currently have the capacity to support Send Later in Betterbird."
@scar Most people, after having been told _twice_ that help is unavailable, would stop asking. But nope, you kept going. Your _words_ here are polite, but _what you are asking_ is rude.
@scar Here's my reply in which I pointed that out. Note: no swearing, no name-calling. Just you're being rude, please stop.
@scar And here's where you switched to your personal email account and got abusive, presumably because a little voice in the back of your head told you it might be a bad idea to be abusive to people from your work email.
@scar And here's your last reply to me, which is totally normal and not at all the type of reply you get from an internet kook (ooh, a lawsuit threat! how original and not something I've ever encountered before, having been active under my own name on the internet since 1987!).
Philip Mallegol-Hansen@jik Gotta love the classic misinterpretation of the first amendment as well.
It means I can be a dick to you and you have to take it (No, because you arenβt the government limiting his speech), but it doesnβt mean you are allowed to complain to my employer (Of course you can).
@philip @jik@federate.social Actually it means I can't be punished by my employer for being a dick in personal time, to someone who was first being a dick to me. It doesn't give Jonathan a right to complain in a malicious attempt to interfere in my job, that's likely illegal. Yes anyone can break the law & cause serious damage to the victim in the process. It's shortsighted however & the punishment in return is severe, albeit slow. Your encouragement to break laws likely violates Mastodon's TOS, as well.
@scar Yawn, I'm going to go ahead and use the block button now.
I suppose that stifles your speech on MY server too right?