Next week, France is forced yet again to reduce output and in some cases completely shut down nuclear reactors as the high temperatures heats up the cooling water they take from rivers beyond acceptable limits. This is the new normal now and will only get worse over the following years as we collectively ignore #ClimateChange
@jwildeboer And our Cour des Comptes said it only concern 1 to 2% of nuclear power.
In the same time, solar panel must be cooled with water to stay at 25°. Each ° above is 0.2% to 0.5% less power.

@[email protected] @jwildeboer So, I see this is relevant, but is it the most important aspect? According to your statement, at 50°C we'll have 13% less power from each panel max ... as compared to playing with the cooling system of nuclear reactors. I bet accidents never happened this way

UPDATE: I was arguing here against bots, I deleted all my follow-up posts as they were mostly to trick the bots to do basic calculations.

@tibersept @jwildeboer We don't play with the cooling system. We lower down 1 to 2% of power to avoid any damage to nature and plant.

@aeris @jwildeboer @tibersept It was 1–2% on average AFAIR, that may sound low, but during short critical periods, this causes noticeable energy shortages in the grid. Temperature limits for rivers have even been raised to avoid shutdowns, showing the issue isn’t trivial.

Nuclear plants can be built without natural water sources using closed cooling or wastewater, but France didn’t do this because it’s more expensive and complex. Alternative cooling would increase costs and possibly water use.

Here, many solar parks and private systems exist, but none with water cooling. Especially with PV surplus, using water to improve efficiency makes little sense.

@jwildeboer @tibersept @flxtr No, it's not 1-2% on avg, but 1-2% maximum and in 2050.
@aeris @jwildeboer @tibersept 2050? Don't think we are talking about the same thing.