so who the fuck at Creative Commons is pushing the AI bullshit this month

(i've just been through the site seeing how they set up for this present fuckery, want to know more of the story)

here is some past fuckery
https://creativecommons.org/2024/07/24/preferencesignals/

> Generatve AI is here to stay

much neutral very CC wow

and more recently, for the present fuckery:

https://creativecommons.org/ai-and-the-commons/

> A clear message emerged: many creators and communities feel uneasy about their content being used to develop AI without transparency and are seeking ways to regain agency. Our community has called on us to intervene with new tools that help rebalance power, ultimately infusing the AI ecosystem with reciprocity.

I am going to say straight up that whoever at CC wrote that last sentence was just fucking lying and nobody called upon them for any such AI bullshit.

who with a *name* who we can ask *questions* is asking for this?

Questions for Consideration on AI & the Commons - Creative Commons

The intersection of AI, copyright, creativity, and the commons has been a focal point of conversations within our community for the past couple of years.

Creative Commons

remember that Creative Commons has fallen for NFT and shitcoin grifts before, when they let Filecoin bribe them into NFT land

https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2021/11/26/creative-commons-is-shilling-nfts/

and EFF was crawling up coiners' arses at the same time too, reminding us that these are Silicon Valley libertarian organisations that are extremely into the corporate funding

Creative Commons is shilling NFTs

Creative Commons is also accepting sponsorships from crypto companies.

Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain
@davidgerard eff is still calling the fediverse "dweb" literally today