@davidaugust I have the heretical view that it's not only possible, but wise to just post one's own videos on one's own blog with #RSS. As long as the videos are shot in a lower resolution, they are much smaller in size. Hundreds of such videos (say ~160MB each, for an hour's video in 360p) can be saved in the tens of GB that come with renting cheap VPS'. Then a javascript video player like clappr embeds the videos on one's personal web pages. A mountain of #enshittification is avoided in this way.

All the "broken glass" we're being dragged over - as is in the OP - results from unwisely trusting 3rd parties to host the videos. My unpopular opinion is: don't use those 3rd parties, period. Be the 1st party, even if your efforts are a little amateur-looking. The key is to quit being greedy with high resolution - which plays into the hands of #AI, btw. This is to make the file sizes more wieldly and self-manageable. No transcoding, etc. Every such simplification matters.

**You get to set your own license this way also**, such as:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Deed - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International - Creative Commons

@d1 You're not wrong, and if one has no aim to monetize video, or get paid to make them, that can work.

@davidaugust
Anecdotally: A video on Youtube needs to have at least 30,000 views, apparently, before you even so much as earn $300US on it:

"The True Costs of Being on YouTube":
https://carlalallimusic.substack.com/p/the-true-costs-of-being-on-youtube

Also note 👆 : They, #Youtube, are keeping 2 of every 3 dollars of ad revenue that passes through them.

And as to in-video ad sposorships: only about 0.21% of all Youtube content creators have such sponsorships:

"How a computer that 'drunk dials' videos is exposing YouTube's secrets":
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250213-youtube-at-20-a-computer-that-drunk-dials-online-videos-reveals-statistics-that-google-doesnt-want-you-to-know

The True Costs of Being on YouTube

what I spent, what I earned, and why I'm walking away

Food Processing
@d1 thank you for sharing that. Good insights in both articles about the not-one-size-fits-all way that the economics and such of YouTube play out.

@d1 @davidaugust

During the pandemic, people started uploading on #pornhub instead, since ph is paying better.

You can take math courses on ph.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/math-tutor-video-lessons-pornhub-changhsu/

We Asked the Math Tutor Who Posts His Lessons on Pornhub: Why?

A math tutor has raked in over a million views on Pornhub by teaching calculus in a hoodie.

VICE

@panda @d1 amazing. Turns out the internet is for porn...and math.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTJvdGcb7Fs

The Internet Is For Porn - Avenue Q - Original Broadway Cast

YouTube
@d1 @davidaugust I am much more likely to click on a video hosted *at* a blog than to click through to Youtube, etc. I don't want to be there.
@d1 @davidaugust also gotta mention PeerTube, Loops, and whatever else exists that I haven't heard of yet, but yes. 1080p is nice and certainly noticeably nicer than 360p... but also so much bigger. I'm sure 4K is nicer, but I wouldn't know as I wear glasses regardless.