Unpopular opinion: It is reasonable to describe random crap by volunteers with no warranty as part of a "supply chain" if it turns out a business is inhaling the random crap into their product. If a company's supply chain was to get their office furniture by driving around and seeing if anyone was throwing out couches on garbage day, that would be a supply chain, it would just be an obviously foolish one
Wait I think I withdraw my above statement because "demand chain" / "software demand chain" is just too good
@mcc but notice that it also inverts some meanings: a healthy dema d chain is _not_ a good thing :)
×
Wait I think I withdraw my above statement because "demand chain" / "software demand chain" is just too good
@mcc and the people making demands of that chain? We call them “chain yankers”.

@mcc "software demand chain attack" also works well

(it's a little "dragonball Z" but that may be an advantage)

@mcc Goldish Lookin Chain.
@mcc software alms race
@mcc it also works really well at exposing the attack surface and whose fault it is. "It's a demand chain vulnerability because you went out of your way to obtain code from some random unpaid unknown actor and run it within your machine. You moron"

@elrohir It's not like there are greater assurances provided if the code is written by some known actor who/that gets paid.

@mcc

@mkj @elrohir when i pay someone money i expect i get assurances in return
@mcc @mkj @elrohir Clearly that is not the industry norm these days...
@dalias @mcc @mkj @elrohir At least you have *some* influence on how much time the person spends to work on the project.
Not that this wouldn't still lead to the situation that companies ask for way more than they pay for.
@mcc but notice that it also inverts some meanings: a healthy dema d chain is _not_ a good thing :)