In the face of increasingly convincing AI & its use in fraud, Stephen Bush (FT) think's face-to-face interactions will be on the way back;

'As smart machines do more & more work in research, bureaucracy & design, one solution to the “verification problem” may be that anything that requires peer to peer checking increasingly returns to face to face encounters'.

I like the idea that after the enhsittification of online communications, the real world will look more reliable.

#SocialMedia #AI

@ChrisMayLA6 History is filled with periods going from one extreme to another, and I wouldn’t be surprised if extreme digitalization leads to a return of human interaction. I would even welcome it.

I have a blog article draft mentioning that the more the tech industry tries to take away humanity from us, the more I appreciate the latter.

It contrasts with years ago when people couldn’t stay far away enough for me.

@ChrisMayLA6 "AI and fraud"

It is likely that more and more original work will be timestamped and digitally signed using trusted certification services- face to face encounters to verify sources is expensive (and unhygienic).

There is a whole industry (that could be deployed) currently looking for "prior art" in patent applications that has been largely undermined by the U.S. "money talks" attitude.

Now - AI "hunter turns game keeper" finds copyright infringement, locates original work and protects intellectual property - it's going to be a lawyer feeding frenzy

@thanetric

Hmmm.... I'm less optimistic than you are that solving the problems with AI just needs more AI.... it's just a constant re-iteration of the arms race with fraudsters.

@ChrisMayLA6 didn't mean to be optimistic - completely out of character😀
@ChrisMayLA6 does this imply that the entire LLM scam industry is just another axis of the executive class's war on remote work?
@ChrisMayLA6
My hope is that deep fakes become so good and accessible that it essentially neutralizes the surveillance state.
@ChrisMayLA6 @cstross Personally considering the utter disregard for the pandemic and glaring lack of meaningful biosafety improvements in our public transportation since, I am not enthussed with such a notion at all.

More reliably endangering myself isn't the kind of reliability I want.
@ChrisMayLA6 if that turns out to be true it's yet another backwards step on accessibility as remote work will be pushed back on even more and disabled and chronically ill folks will be further excluded.

@ChrisMayLA6 the last time I had a face to face appointment at the bank they followed the "trust but verify" train of thought:

1. Pre-booked appointment
2. We presented ID (passport, driving licence)
3. They sent a verification prompt to the banking app on our phones

I was quite impressed by that at the time.

@greem @ChrisMayLA6 When we bought our house recently I carried out the transactions face to face. Physically went to the bank to get a cashier’s check, took that check to the escrow company. Because, as I told them, I work in computer security… An ex-colleague was skillfully phished and nearly lost $300k.
@ChrisMayLA6 Just running with this a bit, I can also see a case where "AI viruses" could subtly rewrite contracts and legislation making computer-mediated text untrustworthy. The gold standard for trustworthy data might become the epic poem.

@philfeld

Great too see the epic poem making a return to political life....

@ChrisMayLA6 I for one am looking forward to the age of poet-lawyers
@ChrisMayLA6 After an incredibly long and frustrating telephone conversation with a bank, in which they wanted my consent for something they couldn't satisfactorily explain, I'm glad I can just go to my local branch.