@evan
The world would be better off if no countries had nuclear weapons. Most people believe that, don't they?
@mpjgregoire @virtuous_sloth right. I think that's the point of the non-proliferation treaty: that non-weapons-holding countries can develop nuclear power without making weapons, and that countries with weapons will disarm.
Four countries (India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea) didn't sign the deal, and now have weapons.
Right now, the US is bombing one NPT signatory on behalf of one of the non-signatories.
So, should countries be like Israel, or like Iran?
@evan People keep telling me these days that renewables are cheaper than nuclear power plants, so maybe now no country should have nuclear programmes, peaceful or otherwise. I certainly don't think a Gulf State should be spending money on nuclear energy — they have no shortage of sunlight or of fossil fuels.
My answer to the poll was "No nuclear programme". Though I meant more that countries that don't have one shouldn't start, than that France should shut down Areva.