JC_RevJoin Revolupedia, the People's Encyclopedia!
ComradeSharkfuckerJust contribute to prolewiki instead of splitting our efforts
There line is bourgeois, Revolupedia’s line is proletarian. We are not working for the same goals.
RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]
CriticalResist8That’s great. Can you explain why you - sorry, I meant Wisconcom, who is obviously not you - have been a self-proclaimed hoxhaist for years, then when your defunct red spectre thing said that hoxha was actually a revisionist you followed along and edited his page to reflect that, but as soon as red spectre went defunct you undid Philip’s whatever-his-fake-name-is edit?
User and perhaps known content creator The Statesian Bolshevik was banned from revolupedia for, as per his own claim, not following along with repudiating hoxha - perhaps that is why you obeyed the order, so that you wouldn’t get banned from the red spectre? Only rehabilitating hoxha when it became safe to do so, after the red spectre had disbanded and you gained complete control over revolupedia, not tied to any organization anymore.
Following the dissolution of red spectre you also banned all of its membersfrom revolupedia with no reason attached in the log. Can people expect this kind of treatment if they join revolupedia too? The block list names can be compared to the red spectre constitutional document for verification.
Now you call yourself a maoist, flip-flopping between positions never quite picking one to stand on as for years prior you called yourself a hoxhaist, until you decided some time ago that it wasn’t actually the right term (despite using it yourself, and insisting that you were always an anti-revisionist marxist-leninist instead).
Just wondering. since you say revolupedia has internal democracy and is grounded in marxist theory you probably won’t mind answering these questions. People deserve to know if they can expect this kind of opportunism and ideology shopping to be going on if they join, and what kind of ‘internal democracy’, as per your other comment, you managed to build on that shaky foundation, because you have not given any examples.
AgentRedAs Chairman Mao said, “no investigation, no right to speak”.
Regarding your topics you raised, the (ex-)Red Spectre members banned were nothing more than factionalists and traitors who openly violated democratic centralism and generally engaged in toxic behavior (they literally, and falsely, accused my comrades of killing somebody and sexual assault). Philip in particular faked his own death for political gain. These are not victims. When I banned those people, I was defending the project.
Additionally, you raise a good point when you mention TheStatesianBolshevik. However, his ban was done to conform with democratic centralism and as soon as the project became unfettered from RS’s line, he was unbanned.
We have very clear policies on bannings and most people who come hear are not going to get banned. On the contrary, we have recently opened up to anti-revisionists of all stripes.
15 hours old account made expressly to respond to this topic that was once deleted and has been undeleted by the author
hmm