An em-dash may seem inconsequential.
But its perceived inconsequence is precisely why it should be defended.
If the humble em-dash can’t be defended, what will happen when more consequential freedom of expression needs defending?
This is the “if you write correctly we’ll assume you’re a machine”, aka “let’s punish ND people for the AI shitshow we created” discussion, right?
@avuko I guess that’s what it is because, actually, I’m autistic.
Ironically, I sometimes use AI to communicate in a more neurotypical way. That is, when I feel discussions are getting intense, and I need a way to adjust tone in order to calm people down.
@atomicpoet I hadn’t considered using it that way. Sounds like a plan.
My only use to date is simplifying texts, as English isn’t my native language.
@avuko Yes, I meant “more neurotypical way”. Good catch.
Anyway, if you want to know how I use LLMs to adjust tone, it’s quite simple.
First, I ask ChatGPT to interpret the text and ascertain the tone to confirm whether or not someone is hostile, angry, annoyed, etc.
Thereafter, I tell it to change the tone of my response to be more friendly, kind, and conciliatory.
Strangely enough, I started doing this when I sent someone a response via email that said, “okay”. Which resulted in that person cutting off all communication permanently with me.