I have seen what appears to be people crushed to death, on the sidewalks and streets, by the debris from the residential houses destroyed by Israel bombing Tehran.
I'm not going to be sharing those.
You DO NOT attack densely populated areas with high-explosives!
It is by its nature an indiscriminate attack and therefore a war crime.
Regime media reportedly claims there is no radioactive radiation after Israel's bombing of the nuclear facility at Natanz, central Iran.
I doubt they would say there was, if there was, if they can get away with it.
Attacks so far by Israel on various locations in Iran, a summary from the counter-revolutionary and imperialist expeditionary military force IRGC's website, via the Free Trade Union of Iran, in a rough translation:
• Central Tehran
• Qitariyeh, Tehran
• Niavaran, Tehran
• West Tehran and Chitgar
• East Tehran
• Mehrabad, Tehran
• Multiple attacks on Mahallati residential area, Tehran
• Shahid Chamran residential area, Nobeinyad, Tehran
• A building in Kamrani'eh, Tehran
• Narmek, Tehran
• Saadat Abad, Tehran
• Andarzgu, Tehran
• Erkeideh complex at Star Khan, Tehran
• Shahid Daghaghi residential area (extensive attacks), Tehran
• Farahzadi, Tehran
• Headquarters of the General Staff of the Armed Forces
• Azghal, Tehran
• Residence of Ali Shamkhani
• Shahrara, Tehran
• Esatid complex in Saadat Abad Book Market
• Garmdareh
• Marzdaran, Tehran
Other cities and sensitive locations:
• Multiple attacks on Natanz nuclear site
• Parchin facilities
• Several military bases in Tehran
• Natanz nuclear reactor
• Structures near the Natanz nuclear facility
• Khondab
• Arak heavy water reactor
• Borujerd
• Khorramabad
• Hamadan
• Parchin
• Qasr-e Shirin
• Tabriz
• Piranshahr, West Azerbaijan
• Kermanshah
• Ilam
• Araak
'Iran warned it has a "legal and legitimate right" to respond to Israel's deadly attacks Friday [...]'
AFP: https://www.lbcgroup.tv/news/middleeastnews/859717/iran-says-has-39legitimate-right39-to-respond-to-israel-attacks/en?src=rss&utm_source=TheWALL360&utm_medium=Rss-articles&utm_campaign=rss&utm_term=Rss
Actually, no, that is factually incorrect. A State has the right to defend against an attack from another State's territory until that particular instance of attack has ended.
There does not exist any right to "retaliate", nor any right to "preemptive attack".
Both of those are simply acts of war of aggression.
If a State has been attacked from another's territory and they don't resolve it diplomatically, the attacked's right is to bring the matter to the UN Security Council, which then is to consider potential sanctions which may be of many types including economic and even deciding that the attacked State is given the right to go to war against the attacker, for example if the attacks keep reoccurring. In the latter case the attacked State does then have a legal right to go to war without it being a war of aggression, crime against peace.
Both Israel and Iran keep claiming fictional rights to "retaliate" or "preempt" as justifications for war, but those do not exist, for any State equally.
Not my opinion or wish. It's the States' system as they have designed it and all States agree to by declaring themselves States, is a part of the UN Charter and similar.