Our stopped clock technology is still in its infancy, but it's already reached an accuracy rate of two or more times per day, and there's no reason for us to believe that won't improve dramatically in the future
Lately I've noticed an almost cult-like mentality among stopped clock deniers. And if you had asked me six hours ago, I would've agreed with them—that clock was literally as wrong as it can possibly be. But if you're not looking at that clock right this moment,
@joe it is true that the technology is in its early days, and nobody has found a practical application for solving word problems in one relation monoids up to length 11 yet. But once we scale it up to length 12 or 13, the skeptics are going to look foolish for not jumping on the bandwagon sooner