I do not need to hear from people who can't code or at the very minimum seem to actually hate it how I can supposedly code more efficiently

This is a post about large language models

I also do not need to hear from people who can't understand the cognitive load difference between writing code yourself and trying to understand code someone, or *something*, else wrote. Especially when the something else will be able to slip in little bugs that are easy to overlook and which no human coder, not even the most junior, would ever put in there

This is a post about that Ptacek article some people think has some good points for some baffling reason (it doesn't)

If you wanna automatically produce shit code and spend your time babysitting the lying machine then that's a you problem. I'm sure you'll make a consultant who bills out at $150/hour very happy some day. But your character flaws have nothing to do with me so keep that shit to yourself

Also, and I can't believe I'm going to actually deconstruct his arguments further, fucking linters and unit tests? Really?? Putting aside your AI is writing said unit tests so you have no idea what it's testing for, these are tools designed for catching the occasional human flub. They were *not* designed to hold back a tidal wave of sewage such as the one produced by LLMs

Like idk how to tell you this but you can easily introduce bugs that the linter and unit tests won't catch

Shocking, I know

Me sending a thousand AI-driven Mac trucks onto the road: it's fine actually if they do something stupid the guardrails will stop them

*watches a truck slam clean through a guardrail and plummet into a ravine leaving a large mushroom cloud*

Ah. Well. Nevertheless

Anyway, time to go do something more productive than angrily posting about some dipshit being incredibly wrong on the internet

Honestly I think there's a disconnect between LLM proponents when it comes to code and the rest of us. They see code as a purely mechanical thing, and so ripe for automation. To them claims of artistry and craft are something to roll your eyes at, arrogance from senior engineers who think too highly of themselves

Meanwhile said senior engineers have the decades of experience to know how much of programming relies on artistry and craft, how much of it is fundamentally a creative endeavor

@eniko I reckon it's an inferiority complex thing. Easier to think that someone else's skills are worthless than that they have value in ways that you don't.