See also: The Call of Chtulhu

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45397356

I’m Buddhist, and it’s always struck me as odd that so many religious people require their text to be literally true.

If it were to be definitively proven that the person called Jesus Christ never existed as a historical person on earth, the various Christian churches and organizations would stop at nothing to attempt to discredit this. They would be furious.

On the other hand, if it were definitively proven that Siddartha Gautama, the person who will be called the Buddha, never existed as a historical person on earth, most Buddhists would find it interesting, probably even humorous, and would go on happily practicing Buddhism.

That’s very interesting to me. I dont know anything about Buddhism, can you explain why Buddists wouldn’t be affected much if they found out their relifious figure never existed? I think for christians it would be devastating because it would mean all the promises the bible makes wouldn’t come true, like a rewarding after life for it’s followers and a punishing afterlife for non-believers. FYI I’m athiest, but I find religion and it’s verious practices to be fascinating.

Because it doesn’t change the message at all. And if you follow a religion because you agree with its teachings, does the source really matter??

If you read somewhere you should be kind to others for betterment of the society. You said “that makes sense, I’ll do it from now onwards”, and you later learn it was a fantasy story and wasn’t talking about real life, would you stop being kind? Now replace that with not actively hurting people.