Human_Intelligence_AgencyWhy does mastodon.social censor discussion of "vaccine" harms, especially for "covid vaccines"? We know there are cases of vaccine adverse events including death. After all there is an official "Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System" (VAERS) in USA, yellow card system in UK & Eudravigilence system in EU. Of course one can openly debate whether or not killing some vulnerable people is justified by any evidence of benefit from said "vaccine" to the people who are less vulnerable to such harm.
Could it be possible for mastodon.social to recognise that times have changed and, even if there were perceived reasons for censorship in previous years, during 2025 onwards we should be able to discuss the pros and cons of any given vaccine openly and freely without censorship? Isn't there a danger that mastodon.social becomes a censor on behalf of #BigPharma and #DonaldTrump #operationWarpSpeed rushed approach? Thanks for any comments or thoughts on this and what are grounds for censorship.🙄
Who decides subjective censorship policy on mastodon.social ? I had some posts about "covid vaccines" removed with the reason given that they were "False & misleading information" but I think everything within the post was demonstrably factual, or else a clear question not making a specific claim. If not please just answer with counter-info? I wish the moderators would consider that they are effectively blindly supporting #BigPharma & its now high time to enable polite discussion on this topic🙄