@rzeta0 The contents of the post itself are not objectionable. The problem is with putting them under a post by the Auschwitz Museum, and the volume at which this happens. Our moderation policy is relatively straightforward: Criticism of Israel is permitted, Holocaust inversion is not.
@Gargron

I feel you'll have to explain how this is an holocaust inversion though
@rzeta0
@rakoo
Using a reply-to-glory appended to the Auschwitz Memorial ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
@Gargron @rzeta0
@rood

I had to double-check and "holocaust inversion" isn't just about denying the holocaust, it's pretty much comparing the holocaust with anything. I'm pretty stumbled the situation had gone this far.
@Gargron @rzeta0
@Gargron @rzeta0 this is embarrassing
@Gargron @rzeta0 There is no "Holocaust inversion" in Tariq's post. He literally refers to it as "unimaginable evil"
@Gargron @rzeta0 this is a truly baffling decision, i hope you will take the chance to step back and re-evaluate it