@Cassandra @mhoye Real or putative?
Putative: US labor law requires it.
Real: to punish workers for unionizing and discourage others from following their lead.
It’s illegal, but they are confident that the law will be enforced leniently if at all.
US labor law requires turning off the tipping function on card machines in unionized shops?
How could that then be illegal?
@Cassandra US labor law requires the employer not to make changes to working conditions without bargaining for it if the workplace is unionized. So they construe some benefit as a “change”, then refuse it to unionized workers on the basis that it hasn’t been bargained for. This is a standard union-busting technique in the US.
It is illegal to punish workers for unionizing. So they *claim* they’re doing this to follow the law, but it’s really breaking the law. Does that make sense?