Lady Butterfly she/herUseful guide
skylerTo the several people who reported this post:
This community does not have a ban on AI generated images. Especially ones as silly and harmless as this.
Should a user abuse AI generated images, such as spamming them, then action will be taken against them. But one-off silly images like this are fine.
StarlightDustThis decision should be reconsidered and I would downvote if my instance allowed. Almost every comment is against it here.
I prefer to allow posts with controversial subjects that don’t otherwise violate any rules, such as AI generated images, because it allows for important conversations.
I would rather allow the occasional AI image be posted so that people can discuss why AI images are bad.
setVeryLoud(true);I’ll argue that this is a cat community, not an AI discussion community.
You’re the one who took over c/dogs? And then banned anyone putting up facts about pitbulls. I’m not surprised you’re defending AI garbage, too.
Arguing over doggy eugenics is off-topic on a forum about dog pictures. This was an established rule before I took over the community.
You were banned after being warned and made aware of the rule, after multiple violations and many reports from other users in the modlog.
Besides, I don’t know why you’re tu quoque-ing about this in an unrelated community, nor why you’re harassing me via DM for that matter.
Move on.
And no, AI is strictly banned in all communities I moderate. My comment above is constructive and opens a discussion, unlike your ad hominem comment here.
There are ethical concerns with the use of AI, especially image generation.
c/dogs has a strict no AI policy, and it seems to be appreciated by our users.
Good rule.