I think the most tragic aspect of deploying "AI" in teaching and learning situations is how much it pushes people into a situation of learned helplessness. This constant feeling of not knowing how to do a thing of being incapable of actually doing work on one's tasks is mentally so harmful. How do people under those conditions gain confidence in their abilities? Like ever?

@tante

In the context of education specifically, it also just shows a complete disregard for understanding and knowledge having value in and of themselves. If if someone believes that "AI" is a good method for achieving correct results, that shouldn't be _enough_ to warrant using it in education.

@skjeggtroll @tante Sometimes comparisons to pocket calculators are made. Nobody misses doing logarithms by hand and a society with calculators is vastly superior to one without them.
What are good arguments against that? I think the main one is that AI products don’t replace basic things like multiplications. They replace things that deal with human communication, moral growth, creativity. Plus: you don’t own the LLM like you do a pocket calculator.
Is a neural network like a pocket calculator? "AI" and epistemic injustice

If you go to secondary school in Germany for the last 2 years you have to pick a bunch of specializations, subjects you want to focus on to a degree. You spend more time on these subjects and your final grade is strongly influenced by your results in those courses. When I picked math as […]

Smashing Frames
@tante @skjeggtroll Thanks, I didn’t know your essay about the calculator conparison yet. It’s indeed an important point. Owning the skills and knowledge. There was a kinda depressing article about automation coming for the IT workers who have enjoyed superstar status because their unique skills were in such high demand. I think it was by Doctorow.