@tomayac Any chance you could amend that article to include the word “proposed” as in “the *proposed* `permission` element”?
Right now it reads as though this is an HTML element that you’d find in the spec, which as you know, given Apple and Mozilla’s stance, is not the case.
I really hope that the current wording is an oversight rather than deliberate sneakiness.
@adactio It's actually the first sentence that implies that this is non-final: "The HTML <permission> element is still in origin trial, as the Chrome team refines it, building upon the foundation laid in our initial origin trial".
But I'm happy to make this read "The <ins>proposed</ins> HTML <permission> element is still in origin trial, as the Chrome team refines it, building upon the foundation laid in our initial origin trial", no worries at all.