"I am starting a petition to no longer refer to AI "art" as AI art but instead as Computer-Rendered Artificial Pictures (CRAP).
Pass it on."
"I am starting a petition to no longer refer to AI "art" as AI art but instead as Computer-Rendered Artificial Pictures (CRAP).
Pass it on."
AI Art: How can it be expressive if it's not human?
But I suppose, like photography, the expressive bit can come from the selection (which generated image the artist chooses to showcase?) - and from the instruction given to the agent.
It leaves out the ritual and the joy of the process that can only come from making it by hand.
In a world teeming with #AI images, the rare thing, the valued thing, will be the art made by the hand and conceived by the mind of a human being.
@lymphomation @mthie except a person points a camera, adjusts the settings, clicks the shutter, processes (darkroom or lightroom/digital equivalent) and post-processes. They were in a place to capture it.
AI has chewed up every human-produced work on the Internet. It spits out a collage of that theft when someone asks it to.
There is a gulf of difference, and zero skill in the latter.
Indeed I'd say it's just a lack of imagination that leads prompt jockeys to think they're doing something.
I generally agree with all of the issues cited. I don't see the need to demonize people who engage in it ... but I agree that it's not art - it's not expressive, it's too easy - all of that.
More on the topic of #AI as #art - just my take: Are #AI-generated Images Works of Art?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wCAgmx3Csqx9C25HD0C_b66HIAOJxQEKuEbMQpYSZew/edit?usp=sharing
DIARY of My ART By Karl Schwartz For inquires: [email protected] "Every good painter paints what he is" - Jackson Pollock Recently added Topics: Biosketch | Professor Gelber’s on my Student work in the MFA program at Brooklyn College Drawing has been my life-long obsession - from life but ...