@jasongorman well you could have made the same argument for search engines 20 years ago. massively energy-intense, unprofitable, used by (comparatively) few people. and take Bing as an example: nobody I know uses that.
I don't want to say everything AI is cool and unproblematic, but the nihilistic, Manichean rethoric is kinda tired by now. there's lots of good (many still potential---the tech is like 3 years old) uses of the new AI tools and the environmental concerns are weirdly specific (I've heard maybe 2 people in my entire life ever complaining about the environmental impact of social media or search engines... what's the sudden worry?)
@mc @jasongorman
> you could have made the same argument for search engines 20 years ago. massively energy-intense, unprofitable, used by (comparatively) few people.
what are you talking about.
We were all using google in 2005, because it was damn good, practically all the time.
There was no debate about whether google was good for anything, because people generally found what they were looking for.
@mc @jasongorman
> I don't want to say everything AI is cool and unproblematic, but the nihilistic
*nihilistic*.
What the fuck are you talking about.
if i criticize "a.i.", that doesn't imply that i think there's *nothing* worth believing in.