Harry Potter fans tend to argue for the seperation of art from the artist.

That's a maybe.

But unlike, say, Lovecraft, your money is going to an alive person that is trying to eradicate my people *using* that money.

I wouldn't be able to look myself in the mirror if I did that to any minority.

I've seen many arguments for/against the franchise based solely on subjectives: that the stories are good or bad, nostalgic or unfamiliar...

Objectively, whether you like it or not, it's a massive franchise that directly funds transphobic politics.

No argument can really make me ignore that fact.

I get the nostalgia.

Harry Potter was a big part of my childhood. Gaiman's works were a big part of my teenage years.

I put my books and things away, and away they will stay. And I will never give either another penny.

Because they're just things, and things are never more important than people.

@thejessiekirk
My only comment is that if you already own a copy of a book, tv show or movie, it is complete okay to watch it, read it now. Getting rid of it doesn't help anyone.
@siobhan @thejessiekirk Maybe getting rid of Rowling and Gaiman’s books won’t help people but it is a personal choice. In my case Harry Potter has become so toxic to me that I don’t want it my house anymore.
@SailorDisco @thejessiekirk
I never said that you had to keep it, just that you could without feeling guilty.