Paul Förster Apr 26

I *HATE* pasting with formatting. Whatever moron even created that "feature" and made it default should be fired. Pasting with formatting has never worked even once in my whole life and only creates a mess, always and with a reliable 100% certainty. And yes, on Windows as well as macOS.

https://www.macrumors.com/how-to/macos-copy-paste-text-without-formatting/

#Windows #macOS #Apple #Microsoft

macOS Quick Tip: Copy and Paste Text Without Formatting

If you're a Mac user with a Windows PC background, you'll probably know how to use the typical copy and paste commands in macOS. But...

MacRumors
Show threadMalcolm Herbert
@paulfoerster for completeness - shift+ctrl+v on Windows does much the same thing ... you may find that the same combo works on macOS also for those with muscle-memory that's sticky between OSes ... unsure whether win+ctrl+v on Windows would dtrt but I can check when I get to work (currently on Linux)
Apr 30 at 9:48pmWeb
Show threadPaul Förster May 1

@mherbert shift-ctrl-v does not work because shift-ctrl invokes the magnifying glass. I need that often and need a really quick access key for it. So, everything shift-ctrl is out of the question.

Also, I use Pasta (not to be confused with Pasteapp). It lets me indirecty do that calling the window and selecting the snipped to be pasted with alt. Then paste as usual with cmd-v gets plain text. But that's an extra step, i. e. slower.

I think, I just stick with shift-ctrl-alt-cmd-v.

Show threadMalcolm HerbertMay 1
@paulfoerster ah well, consistency is such a fleeting thing in the IT world ... I don't tend to use a mac, so I'm generally all at sea when I do and that would probably be why ... :)
Show threadMalcolm HerbertMay 1
@paulfoerster I have an ergonomic keyboard which has a PC/Mac switch ... never really think much of it except when after some time handling the keyboard it does work its way to the Mac setting ... the mac-specific keys generate different scancodes than the same key when in PC mode ...
Show threadPaul Förster May 1
@mherbert Interpreting scan-codes is a science on its own right. I miss the golden C64 days when it was a simple matrix. 🤣
Show threadMalcolm HerbertMay 2
@paulfoerster ... for some unknown reason I still recall that 'print chr(147);' cleared the screen on my vic-20 back in the day ... totally useless knowledge now though ...
Show threadPaul Förster May 2

@mherbert Yes, but it's CHR$(147) and not CHR(147). Also, if you replace the 147 with 19, the cursor just moves to the home position (top left). 🤣

Also, not useless knowledge if you still have fun with those old machines as I do.