Harry Potter fans tend to argue for the seperation of art from the artist.

That's a maybe.

But unlike, say, Lovecraft, your money is going to an alive person that is trying to eradicate my people *using* that money.

I wouldn't be able to look myself in the mirror if I did that to any minority.

I've seen many arguments for/against the franchise based solely on subjectives: that the stories are good or bad, nostalgic or unfamiliar...

Objectively, whether you like it or not, it's a massive franchise that directly funds transphobic politics.

No argument can really make me ignore that fact.

I get the nostalgia.

Harry Potter was a big part of my childhood. Gaiman's works were a big part of my teenage years.

I put my books and things away, and away they will stay. And I will never give either another penny.

Because they're just things, and things are never more important than people.

@thejessiekirk Harry Potter got popular when I was an adult and I read the books because so many people wanted to ban them. I can really see why they were so special for kids. But now I can't hear anything about that series without thinking about how noxious JKR is as a person. I have zero desire to give that woman even one more dime. People should revisit Lord of the Rings instead of her stories.
@Jennifer @thejessiekirk When you read the books or watch the movies with a critical eye, taking with it the vitriol she's spewing, and also the other copyrighted works she blatantly stole her ideas from, it just gets more and more rotten...