I'm glad somebody out there is brave enough to push back against the "personal ChatGPT usage is terrible for the environment" message https://andymasley.substack.com/p/a-cheat-sheet-for-conversations-about

"If you want to prompt ChatGPT 40 times, you can just stop your shower 1 second early."

"If I choose not to take a flight to Europe, I save 3,500,000 ChatGPT searches. this is like stopping more than 7 people from searching ChatGPT for their entire lives."

Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment - a cheat sheet

The numbers clearly show this is a pointless distraction for the climate movement

Andy Masley

@simon I think a big problem with AI is that it's being forced upon us at a time when our polution should be decreasing, and should have been for many years.

And now, instead of it, we've figured out a new way to burn fossil fuels for something we never needed in the first place. (Or at best, marginally needed, I mean, we already had artists and notulists etc).

So I see this argument (of consumption by LLM) as a generic system critique. Just like we need to get rid of our plastic dependency, but if you measure it per person per packaged piece of candy: is super small.