so is the logical action now for trans men to go into public women's toilets as often as possible, and tell people to write to their MPs if they seem unhappy about it?
so is the logical action now for trans men to go into public women's toilets as often as possible, and tell people to write to their MPs if they seem unhappy about it?
just in case this is relevant to anyone, here is a printable PDF of A6-size notes to give to people who seem uncomfortable about there being men in the women's toilets https://jmp.sh/s/5Q812BonEW6RgsSTQ8Bd
The “More information” URL (https://shorturl.at/mAUv9) leads to the EHRC's website, where you can leave feedback if the guidance isn't clear. “Was this page useful? No”
For example, I chose the option that says “I can't work out what I should do next” and asked:
What process should service providers use to accurately determine whether a person is a “biological woman” or “biological man”?
@Averixus from my understanding and from what ive read from other sourcrs, point(?) 221 of the ruling lays out the argument that trans men can ALSO be excluded if they look "too masculine", potentially removing both options for them
regardless of the wording, it does not make it safe for trans men to use women's facilities. I'd gently urge considering trans men as more than a "gotcha"
@Averixus This sign may be helpful for doors into gendered facilities, where applicable.
PDF (expires after 30 days): https://upload.disroot.org/r/R1wEJWyo#rkw4DMNEK1gc9N3dOnaehgBMzIZ8eAhfhyWo0mxAJwM=
What a market opportunity!
One need only present one's sex card, issued by the central authority, to the card reader that unlocks the door and allows access.
The optical card reader is centrally networked for security, so that sex crimes, such as counterfeiting and piracy, could be detected and prosecuted.
Introduction would be phased: children would be issued color coded sex cards that could be worn about their necks, and adults would use their drivers license.