How to stay on Windows 10 instead of installing Linux (by @lproven): Turns out that Microsoft will support Windows 10 until 2032 *if* you can live without their cloud and AI bullshit: just download/install an obscure version aimed at corporate clients who want long-term support:

https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/22/windows_10_ltsc/?td=rt-3a

(I'm a macOS/Linux guy, but if I had an old Win10 box and wanted to avoid Windows 11 and Recall this would be a great way forward)

How to stay on Windows 10 instead of installing Linux

: Can't run Windows 11? Don't want to? There are surprisingly legal options

The Register
@cstross @lproven Useful! Thanks Charlie!
Windows 10 Updates After End-Of-Life | MAS

This document explains how users can receive official updates after the retirement date of Windows 10 on October 14, 2025.

@frumble @cstross FWIW I did link to Massgrave in the article, and I've been telling people here, and in the comments, to _follow the links_ and _read the destination *closely*._
@cstross @lproven yeah but this is giving me the push I need to move to Linux.
@econads @cstross Oh yes. I am the Linux guy at @theregister and as I said in the piece, I advocate changing platform... but for instance one friend of mine needs 2 critical Windows apps.
@lproven @cstross @theregister oh for sure I wasn't dropping hints, it was more a reminder to me that I need to get my arse in gear.
@cstross Or, hear me out, we help people install Linux. Great community building opportunity πŸ˜„
@collectifission Great *cat-hoovering* opportunity, you mean. (Linux is a great way to lose days and weeks tweaking your system until it works kinda-sorta they way you want it to, and it only got worse once the on-boarding process moved from RTFM to a mixture of RTFSC ("read the f'ing source code") and goddamn YouTube videos optimized to max out the pundit's earnings rather than help you fix your problem.

@cstross @collectifission The average user wouldn't do all that though. Sure, you and I tweak our systems to work as optimally as possible. But your average user doesn't.

I have seen the exact opposite of going from RTFM to RTFSC though. I'm seeing "why don't you ask about it in our help forum?" I mean, even Arch does that... Heck, when I ran into a Debian issue I saw they still had an IRC channel. (Though they didn't have a Web IRC client, so +2/-1 I guess since it's asking someone to install a thing they may not fully understand.)

I haven't been told to read the manual in probably more than fifteen years and no one has ever told me to read the source code. (Closest I've had was someone telling me to learn to code and make my own contributions in a feature request on something.)

@cstross @collectifission Oh, and to be clear, the "learn to code and make your own contributions" comment wasn't on a project that was in any way related to an OS (except insofar as that the software ran inside of one.)

@cstross @collectifission
I am a Linux user since 2007. Never once have I read ANY source code. I don't compile my own kernel. I go an just install software that is provided by my current package manager.

Outside of some exotic or brand new hardware, or NVidia being Nvidia (moved to AMD soon after), I have never encountered any major problems that I couldn't solve with either a reinstall (which is pretty much the Windows way) it a quick search and a few commands in the terminal.

Additionally, the terminal is not needed that often any more. Pretty much every terminal tool has more then one GUI that can be use to configure it. Be it GRUB, CUPS, corn, X11...

@MeiLin @collectifission

> Additionally, the terminal is not needed that often any more.

How absolutely ghastly! I live in the terminal. Used to work in it exclusively until 1994-ish.

@cstross @MeiLin @collectifission I currently have 17 terminals open in various tiles and tabs on various workspaces on Debian. It's a life style choice at this point I guess!

To be fair, I usually have a bunch of tabs open in Windows Terminal at work too, so definitely a way of life.

@veronica @cstross @collectifission
As and i3 user I have it easy to get into a terminal, and I will use it for things and stuff.

But I am just a filthy casual when I comes to Linux, even after 18 years.

@cstross

That has not been my experience.

But that doesn't mean that switching to a totally free OS that won't track your every move won't require some investment of your time.

@collectifission

@jrredho @collectifission I wrote a monthly magazine column about FOSS (and Linux) for several years back in the 00s; I worked for a Unix VAR for years before that, I think I have a reasonable grasp of the subject. "Some investment of your time" is MASSIVELY low-balling it.

@cstross

No one is questioning your acumen or your pedigree.

There are many #linux distributions that are tailored for relative novices, such as #Mint and maybe #ubuntu These same distros often have tremendous help forums contibutors that are really helpful and polite should you have problems or questions.

Besides, if things are always so easy and clearcut with Windows OS, why are there so many Web resources dedicated to solving problems involving it?

@collectifission

@jrredho Mint is generally great and I generally love it.

A few months back, I turned a pile of very old Winbox-leftovers in to a nice Linux-for-modest-needs machine. Audio was required. Mint *COULD NOT* understand the on-motherboard audio. Didn't work. At all.

I burned hours of my life trying to make it work before giving up and plugging in a generic USB audio device instead.

And that's hours of "someone with a comp sci degree and a remarkably high tolerance for technical bother and nuisance" time. Someone who was expert at web searching to find answers in the years before Google existed at all.

So no, not even Mint is yet ready for me to suggest it to my Dad - who has genuinely asked me what to do about the impending Win10 "EOL".

@BuxtonTheRed

Yeah, it's breakable. No doubt. It sounds like the BIOS firmware on the motherboard were incompatible with likely any flavor of linux.

I actually tried to include "if the hardware is compatible, which is possible to check" to my response, but I ran out of characters. :)

But, should you get a version installed on a compatible computer. Generally, non-techie people need a browser, a pdf reader, and an MS Office replacement. All of those are available. That ain't rocket science.

@cstross @lproven Wow, this takes me back to the old gravity-defying totally pwned Win98 days. πŸ˜ƒ

@cstross @lproven

IF? Not dealing with the cloud and AI is a selling point.

@csstrowbridge @cstross That, as they say, is the joke.

@cstross @lproven

At USD 300 minimum per license (if you can even find someone to sell you one), that hardly seems worthwhile.

@aserraric @lproven That's assuming you pay the full license fee (plenty of slightly shady folks will sell you an account on eBay for not much money: I think I paid about Β£20 for a legit license to Windows 11 Pro last time I needed one, not the Β£200 M$FT asks for in the store).

@cstross @lproven

Pro or Home licenses are a different beast altogether. MS sells them to PC manufacturers for dirt cheap (under 10$ AFAIK), and while MS want those tied to a new computer and not resold, in some jurisdictions, they can not enforce this. This ends up being a 100% legit license for cheap.

Volume/Enterprise licenses OTOH are completely under the control of MS, and if you didn't get it from them directly, they may go away at any given time. I wouldn't waste money on those.

@aserraric @cstross

1. Read the article more closely, especially including the external links.

2. It's still cheaper than a new PC if you have a good high-end one and you're happy with it.

3. I am told there is considerable haggling and negotiation room here.

4. But mostly, read the external links _thoroughly._

@lproven @cstross

I am not a spring chicken, I know about shady ways to a Windows license.

But if you want something on the up and up, you're going to pay through the nose (because with one or a single digit number of licenses you are not a very interesting customer), all for the questionable privilege of using Win10 LTSC (which will come with software compatibility issues sooner rather than later) for another 7 years.

If you think that's worth it, go for it. I wouldn't.

@cstross @lproven I have access to that obscure LTS version (it's not obscure if you're corporate / educational). But the vendors of our accounting software are going to require Windows 11 from this summer so ...

@oheso @cstross Ye gods. I'd be looking for new accountancy software vendors, then. Anyone unable to support the MS corporate-LTS-product variant is... at the very least, seriously questionable.

A former professional manager of fleets of corporate Windows PCs speaking here, incidentally.

@lproven @cstross Point taken, but that's not my decision to make. Path of least resistance is for me to update the half-dozen machines this affects.

@oheso @cstross Regrettable but fair.

OTOH, in my experience, major promotions or beneficial career changes can result from behaviour such as sticking one's head above the parapet and making damn sure decision-makers are fully aware of warning signs.

@lproven @oheso I would *LOVE* to see the EU legislate that "long term support" means NOT LESS THAN 30 YEARS, and *ALL* operating system public releases must be supported for AT LEAST five years, with massive, company-destroying fines *or* loss of copyright and patent rights to the product as penalties for non-compliance.
@cstross @lproven Ah, if we were king, eh?

@cstross @lproven
... AND you're willing to pay $30 per year.

Merely installing Windows 10 LTSC will get you just over a year extra mainstream (free) security updates. If you install Windows 10 IoT LTSC and you jump through the hoops of setting up ESU and also pay $30 for each year of support, sure, you'll continue to get security updates.

@wdormann @cstross I wrote the article. I strongly urge you to read it more closely, _especially_ the external links I included. All the external links.

@cstross @lproven

you might be able to keep running a LTSC version of Win 10 for a while (and get security support etc) But Microsoft will stop supporting Office on Win 10..

https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/15/24344209/microsoft-365-office-apps-windows-10-end-of-support

Microsoft won’t support Office apps on Windows 10 after October 14th

Microsoft 365 apps will no longer be supported on Windows 10 in October. The support cutoff coincides with Windows 10 end of support.

The Verge

@kat @cstross And this should worry us how and why?

My main production MS app is Word 97, with Word 2003 on a few higher-end machines.

There are many alternatives in this space, and most of them are preferable for various reasons.

@lproven @cstross

well you are not getting security updates for those apps. That may or may not be of concern!

And it's a compliance issue for enterprises that are stuck on LTSC version of win10. It's just a nightmare.

Of course the web versions of M365 apps work...

@kat @cstross @lproven Good. LibreOffice is 1000x better and free.

The real concern IMO is that a lot of other software will drop 10 like a hot potato the moment Microsoft says it's no longer supported. They did that with 7 and 8/8.1 as well. The problem is, even if you can get the 11 builds to work, issues start cropping up because of the system differences that they no longer test for and they will not support (or care) if you report them as bugs because they've dropped support and abandoned it.

But even more concerning, OEMs are going to drop it too. That means drivers will become a problem pretty fast. Especially with modern signing methods. (Signing never should have been allowed to be a thing. I get it, but it basically sets up a paid gatekeeping with Microsoft -- and this.)

@nazokiyoubinbou @kat @cstross @lproven Long time Win 10 user, but I've been on Linux too. I dumped Windows completely at the apparent end of 10 and went all Linux. I had split my machine to run Win on one drive, and Linux on the other. My machine is old, but it works fine. I ran 10 for some games. Doing fine all Linux. One day I will need a new box, but not when Windows makes the decision.

@accipiter @kat @cstross @lproven Good answer. You decide when you buy new hardware. Not one company having this really weird fixation obsession over TPM modules their software doesn't actually need (which is just so freaking weird! 11 can run fine without TPM 2.0. Why are they so obsessed about this??? I have to know!!!)

WINE is pretty great. Look at Lutris or Heroic Games Launcher. I've been able to get most of my games working well enough in Linux that I'd still rather not boot Windows even for them.

@nazokiyoubinbou @kat @cstross @lproven You bet! I have Wine running and manage to play the games I care about. Earlier it was just easier to split. For example, one of my doctors can't manage to link to a Linux box. *Sigh*

@nazokiyoubinbou

As a user of LO I can 100% say it's awful

@cstross @lproven

I'm pondering becoming a Linux guy. Apple's various shenanigans of late have led me to loose faith. Enraging, bc I've been a Mac baby since 1985.

@cavyherd @cstross I am typing on a high-end, maxed-out iMac with decent performance that is unsupported. I hear that.

I suggest trying Ubuntu Unity, which has a quite nice macOS-like desktop. If you could live with a rather limited iPadOS style desktop instead, consider Elementary OS.

@lproven @cstross

I need to get moving on this. I bought my current Mac in 2019, & it's starting to have Issues.* (My previous 2009 Mac still going great guns, modulo the short in the option key & dead left side of the keyboard. Repair guy refused to replace the keyboard bc "cost as much to buy another refurbished." I'm now wishing I'd insisted.)

* Today's task: go buy some canned air to clean out the !$@#$ keyboard.

@cavyherd @cstross @lproven Try Linux Mint. Really easy to setup and use, very rock solid stable and reliable. A great starting point. If you distro hop later, I recommend keeping it on a small partition so you can always boot back into it to fix any problems or move any stuff around since it's so reliable.

@nazokiyoubinbou @cstross @lproven

This sounds like excellent advice. I need to start keeping a notebook of this sort of thing. ::sigh::

What I β€’reallyβ€’ wanna do is throw some money at a local techie & say, "Here, do this for me." & then a retainer to have them explain what they did in Very Small Words.

At this point I am so utterly DONE with tech that the only reason I haven't heaved all my devices out the (closed) living room window is an ongoing need to, you know, eat.

@cavyherd @cstross @lproven You can technically buy systems with Linux preinstalled for whatever that's worth. If you want to do the absolute least effort thing possible you could throw in a new harddrive and just blind install to that drive so you don't have to deal with partitions and stuff. Linux can access Windows partitions directly (unlike the other way around which requires serious hoop jumping) so you can get to your data on the NTFS partition from the Linux drive if you don't want to deal with moving things around.

I do want to say that, for me, divesting in these corporate things like Windows, Google-owned Android ROMs, etc etc has brought back some of my love of tech and learning things. Learning how to get the most out of these alternatives is fun in its own way.

@cstross @lproven people should start using open source operating system like GNU/linux in my opinion.

I am a college student and I have been using it for the past 3 years without any compromise to my productivity..

@saliaku @cstross I am the Linux correspondent and I've been on Linux and related OSes for nearly 30 years now. (I do use other things as well, though. I'm typing on a Mac.)

I *did* advocate Linux instead right at the top of the article.

@saliaku I take it you don't do business with any corporations who require specific proprietary file formats (or you don't get paid). And you don't have a job where the best tools by a very long way only run on proprietary OS's.

Typical student thinking: alas, the grown-up world doesn't work like academia.

@cstross @saliaku WINE can run a lot of Windows software. Open source programs have a lot of dealings with proprietary formats. But it really depends on what sort of format you're even talking about. You left that as such a vague all-encompassing statement, but a surprising number of things don't use proprietary formats anymore. Even, somehow, Microsoft Office went to an open format. (Not sure how anyone got MS, the jack of proprietary, on board with that.) A lot of CAD/etc stuff that is proprietary has Linux builds too.

Of course some companies have things super specialized running in various forms that are super proprietary. Many of those are so specialized and so proprietary they may even be running on DOS or Windows 2000. That isn't applicable to this discussion however...