It's shameful how #Synology decided to take HP's path (and among other printers companies).

Somehow, their "proprietary hard drives" are "more trustworthy", or that is more "secure" or whatever...

In the excellent article, @kevinpurdy also wrote that "Synology does not manufacture its own hard drives but instead certifies and rebrands drives from Toshiba and Seagate (...)"

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/04/synology-could-bring-certified-drive-requirements-to-more-nas-devices/

I think that would be an interesting topic for @pluralistic

Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices

German press release suggests expansion of the company’s “integrated ecosystem.”…

Ars Technica

@inkvisible @kevinpurdy @pluralistic another formerly good corporation commits suicide by enshitfication.

RIP Synology. The model I have already has some limitations on non-branded SSDs and I was mad when I found out about that.

@retrovg @inkvisible @kevinpurdy @pluralistic I'd like to know any details around that since I'm literally 2 hours away from picking up a 2-bay DS723+ and planning to populate it with drives I'm "shucking" from Seagate backup externals.
@soviut @inkvisible @kevinpurdy @pluralistic same case as my device, it has two NVMe ports which it can only use to create another set of volumes if they are Synology-branded. With other brands, they can only be used as a cache for the volumes on HDDs.

@retrovg @inkvisible @kevinpurdy @pluralistic Synology By "synology branded" I'm guessing you mean "synology approved"?

I'm just worried these drives I'm pulling from the backup enclosers aren't going to work for some reason.

@soviut @inkvisible @kevinpurdy @pluralistic all HDDs will work so that's not a problem.

The NVMes (which are full optional) only allow storing data on their own branded sticks, or caching on any brand.

@retrovg @inkvisible @kevinpurdy @pluralistic Okay, thanks for the clarification. I didn't even know Synology had their own NVMe storage.