Python Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()

https://lemmy.world/post/28121911

Python Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len() - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

Yea and then you use “not” with a variable name that does not make it obvious that it is a list and another person who reads the code thinks it is a bool. Hell a couple of months later you yourself wont even understand that it is a list. You should not sacrifice code readability for over optimization, this is phyton after all I don’t think list lengths will be your bottle neck.
In my experience, if you didn’t write the function that creates the list, there’s a solid chance it could be None too, and if you try to check the length of None, you get an error. This is also why returning None when a function fails is bad practice IMO, but that doesn’t seem to stop my coworkers.
Passing None to a function expecting a list is the error…