Those who follow me on The Bad Place have heard me repeat this a thousand times, but once more won't hurt.

Election security is incredibly complex, full of seemingly impossible tradeoffs. But disinformation about supposed "rigged" elections is perhaps the most serious threat to election integrity today.

The best defense is to learn how elections actualy work! Becoming a poll worker is a great way to do that

Also, this National Academies study is a terrific resource:

https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25120/securing-the-vote-protecting-american-democracy

Securing the Vote: Protecting American Democracy

Read online, download a free PDF, or order a copy in print or as an eBook.

The National Academies Press

Also, any serious discussion of election security has to grapple with two simultaneous realities:

- there's no evidence that any US election outcome has ever been altered by hacking

- there are real, exploitable vulnerabilities in many parts of our election infrastructure

I've written a bit on what these vulnerabilities are and how to fix them, See, e.g., this brief article:
https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.2-p505-522-Blaze.pdf

@mattblaze I think people focus too hard on theoretical impossibilities and not enough on actual threat models.

Paper ballots in Brazil had a habit of disappearing, teleporting, being damaged on route... In the US voter suppression and gerrymandering are so bad that frankly you don't need to hack anything to control what votes are counted.

I would guess that sometimes the security gains of a simpler, faster, more accessible process can be more important than using paper slips in an insecure process that is effectively impossible to be audited in practice.

@eldaking @mattblaze this description of the voter suppression attacks on US elections is aging extremely, sadly well