Matt BlazeApr 11, 2025

Trump's official denouncement of former CISA director Chris Krebs (in the form of a "Presidential Memorandum") is chilling in substance and utterly Stalinesque in tone. By threatening anyone who hires him, it aims to render Krebs effectively unemployable.

I said it then, and I will repeat it now: There is simply no evidence that the 2020 election was "hacked". Krebs's forthright clarity about this in November, 2020 was a brave and important act of public service.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/addressing-risks-from-chris-krebs-and-government-censorship/

Addressing Risks from Chris Krebs and Government Censorship

 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The Federal Government has a constitutional duty and a moral responsibility to respect and

The White House
Show threadAlexander Karn

@mattblaze

We will soon move to the public self-criticism stage of this collective nightmare, a la China’s Cultural Revolution.

Apr 11, 2025 at 10:43pmWeb
Show threadMatt BlazeApr 11, 2025
@xankarn It's not yet clear if we go the purges route or the re-education camps route. Fork in the road ahead.
Show threadMaggie MaybeApr 11, 2025

@mattblaze @xankarn If there is profit to be made from both they’ll do both.

He “joked” about a purge situation awhile back, except only the cops could purge.

Show threadLukefromDCApr 12, 2025
@maggiejk @mattblaze @xankarn Note that in a Purge, the rich have to play defense while those with nothing to worry about guarding play offense.
Show threadMaj - 🇨🇦Apr 12, 2025
@mattblaze @xankarn
I would cite the Why Not Both.gif but I don't want to drag a child into this.