Indigenous people will always say “I belong to the land”, while colonizers claim “the land belongs to me”. That is the fundamental difference.

@ErikUden Huh, I didn’t think I would see the return of the myth of the noble savage, but here we are. All of the colonizers came from cultures that had developed the concept of land ownership while they were indigenous.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_savage

Noble savage - Wikipedia

@MartyFouts @ErikUden Land ownership as we know it today is a Roman Imperial concept and just because it was violently spread over Europe for >2000 years doesn't mean it's indigenous here.
It didn't just emerge from the 100s of indigenous cultures in parallell in Europe, but was forced upon them, too.

@KarlHeinzHasliP @ErikUden “as we know it today” is doing a lot of heavy lifting because while the concept varies in detail from culture to culture it arose in every indigenous culture that developed agriculture rather than remain nomadic.

The Romans didn’t invent the concept. They evolved the idea that they got from the Greeks. Meanwhile similar concepts were developed in Asia and South America.

@KarlHeinzHasliP @ErikUden Geometry, after all developed originally to keep track of land ownership before the Romans. There’s archaeological evidence of land ownership in the former of physical boundaries dating back more than 3000 years

Even the Old Testament’s indigenous people had a sense of land ownership.

@MartyFouts @ErikUden The specific reason I'm pointing out Roman law is the imperial "usus et abusus" instead of the traditional "usus fructucs" type of ownership. Very possible that the concept of a license to abuse the land existed pre-roman, too, but to my best knowledge the European colonial concept of land owned by people in a far away capital maximizing material extraction from it with no care on long term viability points straight to that origin.

@KarlHeinzHasliP @ErikUden A worthwhile distinction. I don’t know of any earlier examples. The only possible exception might be how the Old Testament phrase sometimes translated as “dominion over the land” was interpreted.

The Chinese and Mayan cultures had absentee ownership but again I don’t know that relates to your point about abuse.